IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com> Fri, 10 September 2010 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7CC63A69C8 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.467
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.467 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.132, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NhZhyLH3dHv1 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:56:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from etmail.acmepacket.com (etmail.acmepacket.com [216.41.24.6]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D12113A67B7 for <martini@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 03:56:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.7) by etmail.acmepacket.com (216.41.24.6) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.254.0; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:57:06 -0400
Received: from mail.acmepacket.com ([127.0.0.1]) by mail ([127.0.0.1]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:57:06 -0400
From: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>
To: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 06:57:06 -0400
Thread-Topic: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
Thread-Index: ActQ1uhvHKdpO9CwTQKoFU+OIQjNGA==
Message-ID: <E55DE5D3-DB52-453F-A3A4-5D24909B3A07@acmepacket.com>
References: <BLU137-W302E72474ED981657F995E93700@phx.gbl> <639A51A244A4422B99A6510D6EC6C1A5@china.huawei.com>
In-Reply-To: <639A51A244A4422B99A6510D6EC6C1A5@china.huawei.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 10:56:41 -0000

If we make it a SHOULD, what we really mean is MAY.  So why not say what we mean?
Either it's required or it's not.  In this case, it's like a "MUST implement unless you don't want to".  That's a MAY.

-hadriel


On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:

> Speaking as an individual participant ...
> 
> I recognize that public GRUUs are a Good Thing (tm), and I support at least 
> a SHOULD for service provider support of public GRUUs in the GIN protocol 
> specification.
> 
> I prefer SHOULD to MUST for service provider support of public GRUUs, 
> because we have applications where public GRUUs are not absolutely 
> required - for example, SIP connect 1.1 is using third-party call control 
> where public GRUUs might also be used.
> 
> Spencer 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email