IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

"Spencer Dawkins" <spencer@wonderhamster.org> Thu, 09 September 2010 20:23 UTC

Return-Path: <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA7563A6894 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:23:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, STOX_REPLY_TYPE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XKsWDSgvVDYS for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mout.perfora.net (mout.perfora.net [74.208.4.194]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10073A6826 for <martini@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 13:23:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from S73602b ([74.213.26.230]) by mrelay.perfora.net (node=mrus4) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0LaogC-1ORNnN39ZY-00knSp; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 16:24:21 -0400
Message-ID: <639A51A244A4422B99A6510D6EC6C1A5@china.huawei.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, martini@ietf.org
References: <BLU137-W302E72474ED981657F995E93700@phx.gbl>
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 15:24:10 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format="flowed"; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type="original"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.5931
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.5931
X-Provags-ID: V02:K0:HP/WGERZa3XffFPoH1at6IcUhwoA59uCZ7Bf8CyaDGH duuQSbPMmSXJdRfyoZSjNTYUqm0MR8IO6y07g/GjQkAZnYnYXT YlbZEK/02LThMbiDwIv3jA6Tj8LmuqBe6KO+Eeo9DcS7n9yx6V lJZSultXOZ2FvO//2Iwh1A3vYggzsxD+8wCIbfym5kWCrj84zu IDqT6FUzEDNECPBxN8uiS7fZBWG6uwTWjrYVlVXA20=
Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:23:55 -0000

Speaking as an individual participant ...

I recognize that public GRUUs are a Good Thing (tm), and I support at least 
a SHOULD for service provider support of public GRUUs in the GIN protocol 
specification.

I prefer SHOULD to MUST for service provider support of public GRUUs, 
because we have applications where public GRUUs are not absolutely 
required - for example, SIP connect 1.1 is using third-party call control 
where public GRUUs might also be used.

Spencer

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email