Re: [martini] Consensus call on Public GRUU language

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Mon, 11 October 2010 15:40 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 47F803A68D5 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:40:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.665
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.665 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.066, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8tNFEwK4DW4J for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4322E3A68DB for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 11 Oct 2010 08:40:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-228.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9BFf6ZF073487 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:41:06 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4CB33012.2050004@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 10:41:06 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
References: <BLU137-W37C4458629C24486A1473793530@phx.gbl> <4CB32584.7020302@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CB32584.7020302@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] Consensus call on Public GRUU language
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Oct 2010 15:40:38 -0000

  To clarify my earlier comment: I prefer (3), but could go along with 
(2) also.

/a

On 10/11/10 9:56 AM, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
> (2) or (3).
>
>     Thanks,
>     Paul
>
> On 10/10/2010 9:10 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:
>> There is one outstanding issue on the GIN document, which relates to SSP
>> support for public GRUUs. We would now like to have a consensus call of
>> the WG on this point.
>>
>> The consensus call will last until October 17, 2010. Please respond to
>> this email indicating whether you wish to change the current text in the
>> document, and if so, how. Choices include:
>>
>> (1) No change (public GRUU support remains optional).
>>
>> (2) Change the MAY to: "The SSP SHOULD support the public GRUU mechanism
>> described in this section."
>>
>> (3) Change the MAY to: "The SSP MUST support the public GRUU mechanism
>> described in this section, unless the SSP has other means of providing
>> globally routable contact URIs."
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> martini mailing list
>> martini@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini