Re: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG last Call on "Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"

[Adam Roach <[e-mail]>]

  Yes, this matches my understanding as well. I've posted what I think 
are well-reasoned arguments on the list in support of this position. 
There have been no counter-arguments that attempt to explain why the 
combination would be anything but detrimental.

/a

On 7/19/10 11:09 AM, Elwell, John wrote:
> I agree with Richard. My recollection of the discussion was that it leaned towards there not being a dependency between the two drafts - the two can proceed at their own rates.
>
> John
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail]
>> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Richard Shockey
>> Sent: 19 July 2010 16:40
>> To: [e-mail];
>> [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG last Call
>> on "Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
>>
>> My memory of the conversation was quite clear.  The two
>> approaches are orthogonal. Gin is NOT dependant on FRIENDS or
>> the other way around. Each approach should have its own
>> option tag. There is NOT a one size fits all solution.
>>
>>
>>
>> The friends solution can certainly propose a option tag on
>> its own in the usual way IETG WG way but the two are NOT part
>> of a single draft.
>>
>>
>>
>> As far as I'm concerned the WGLC should proceed as normal.
>>
>>
>>
>> From: [e-mail]
>> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
>> [e-mail]
>> Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 9:01 AM
>> To: [e-mail]; [e-mail]
>> Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG last Call
>> on "Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
>>
>>
>>
>> Looking to the minutes of the MARTINI Interim V virtual
>> meeting, it seems that the discussion about
>> "draft-vanelburg-martini-friends-00" was inconclusive as to
>> whether a change was required to the "gin" draft. I don't
>> think the WGLC can be completed before we have clarified the
>> interactions between "gin" and "friends".
>>
>> Bruno
>>
>> 	
>>
>> 	________________________________
>>
>> 		De : [e-mail]
>> [mailto:[e-mail]] De la part de Bernard Aboba
>> 	Envoyé : jeudi 15 juillet 2010 19:57
>> 	À : [e-mail]
>> 	Objet : [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG last
>> Call on "Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
>>
>> 	This is a reminder of an ongoing MARTINI WG last call
>> on "Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP" prior
>> to requesting that the IESG publish the document as a
>> Proposed Standard.
>> 	
>> 	The document is available for inspection here:
>> 	
>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-martini-gin-05.txt
>> 	
>> 	MARTINI WG last call will conclude on Thursday, July 22, 2010.
>>
>> 	Please respond to this WG last call, whether you have
>> comments or not.
>>
>> 	If you have no comments, please reply to this message
>> and indicate in the body of your message whether you
>>
>> 	think the document is ready for consideration by the
>> IESG or not.
>>
>> 	If you have comments, please provide them to the WG in
>> one of the following ways:
>>
>> 	1. If you have an account on the IETF Tools server, or
>> can open one, please login and enter your issue(s) in the
>>
>> 	MARTINI Issue tracking database (TRAC), which is available here:
>>
>> 	http://trac.tools.ietf.org/wg/martini/trac/newticket
>>
>> 	Note that if you submit an issue in TRAC, it will
>> automatically also be posted to the MARTINI WG mailing list.
>>
>> 	2. If you don't have an account on the IETF Tools
>> server, please post your
>>
>> 	Issue to the MARTINI WG mailing list (martini at
>> ietf.org) in the following format:
>>
>> 	To:  martini at ietf.org
>>
>> 	Subject: Requirements-Issue:<title of your issue>
>>
>> 	Priority: blocker, critical, major, minor or trivial
>>
>> 	<Explanation of your issue, including a proposal for
>> specific text changes to resolve the issue>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini