Re: [martini] Consensus call: Resolution of Ticket #57

Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 23:32 UTC

Return-Path: <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 502213A6A13 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:32:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.855
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.855 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.743, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nl7Ibtjb2WbX for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nylon.softarmor.com (nylon.softarmor.com [66.135.38.164]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4609C3A6A0F for <martini@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 16:32:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.2.112] (cpe-66-25-30-183.tx.res.rr.com [66.25.30.183]) (authenticated bits=0) by nylon.softarmor.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-5+lenny1) with ESMTP id o89NWcQF032175 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:32:39 -0500
Message-Id: <9E560124-0D10-4B32-8C17-67AB797DA7FB@softarmor.com>
From: Dean Willis <dean.willis@softarmor.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585015BCA58@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-4-825275203
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 18:32:33 -0500
References: <BLU137-W878D9ABB4B6A396E0682493860@phx.gbl> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C48DB925@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <006e01cb4b74$b0cb15a0$126140e0$@us>, <4C8108EB.2020409@nostrum.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A0585015BCA58@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936)
Cc: "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] Consensus call: Resolution of Ticket #57
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 23:32:17 -0000

On Sep 3, 2010, at 1:13 PM, Christer Holmberg wrote:
>
> I guess that means that the IMS compliant products are not present  
> at SIPit :)
>

Or are totally imaginary.

There's a difference between IMS-oriented and IMS-compliant products.  
To the best of my ability to discern, nobody has an IMS-compliant  
product. They have partially compliant products that are oriented  
towards the IMS market, with vaguely-expressed hopes of becoming more  
compliant if it turns out to be a market requirement, which it never  
will as long as single vendors have locks on monolithic deployments.

--
Dean