IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini-gin

Brian Lindsay <brian.lindsay@genband.com> Mon, 19 July 2010 13:26 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.lindsay@genband.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD7FE3A6829 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8w7YWc1FLcAM for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og113.obsmtp.com (exprod7og113.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.179]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B98A3A659B for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:26:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([63.149.188.88]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob113.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTERSnN9A1p5Cf5QlddvCcWJce40iva4r@postini.com; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 06:26:54 PDT
Received: from owa.genband.com ([172.16.21.97]) by mail.genband.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:26:44 -0500
Received: from GBPLMAIL01.genband.com ([fe80::5527:203:6352:79a0]) by GBEX01.genband.com ([fe80::8063:55ef:b7ab:3543%14]) with mapi; Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:26:44 -0500
From: Brian Lindsay <brian.lindsay@genband.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini-gin
Thread-Index: AQHLJpsgpdp9jmQ5tkKJSutf85I+M5K4LD/Q
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:26:40 +0000
Message-ID: <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E4037905@gbplmail01.genband.com>
References: <BLU137-W10550BA232377BE7913FFE93B30@phx.gbl> <D7C725AD-CBBD-4DCF-9077-99DC7E218C2E@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <D7C725AD-CBBD-4DCF-9077-99DC7E218C2E@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 19 Jul 2010 13:26:44.0709 (UTC) FILETIME=[0816B150:01CB2746]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4160-6.000.1038-17514.007
X-TM-AS-Result: No--24.776400-5.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Subject: Re: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini-gin
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2010 13:26:43 -0000

Hi,

   I'd disagree with making temp gruu's mandatory to implement in this draft. Some SSP's may have architectures/privacy functions that would not require this to support anonimity (e.g. using B2BUA's). I'd prefer to keep the text as is for temp-gruu's.


Thanks,
Brian

-------------
Brian Lindsay
Sr. Architect, System Architecture
GENBAND
Office: +1.613.763.3459	
www.genband.com

-----Original Message-----
From: martini-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Cullen Jennings
Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 1:02 PM
To: martini@ietf.org
Subject: [martini] WGLC comments on draft-ietf-martini-gin


Looks like a fully formed sausage - I like it. Two issues when I skimmed it. 

The support for temp gruus seems to be optional. I think it should be mandatory to implement. The exact deployment models where we want to use this are the places where many people believe there is a legal requirement to support anonymous calls and implementing this put us into the situation where there are pretty much no alternatives way to do it. 

Please change "must" to "MUST" in section 5.1 
   First, it must contain an option tag of "gin" in
   both a "Require" header field and a "Proxy-Require" header field.
You might want to consider "must" in the next sentence too. 

Cullen


PS - Thank you to Richard for pointing out this to me - I had missed it because I filter on WGLC on the subject lines. 


_______________________________________________
martini mailing list
martini@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email