IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

Bernard Aboba <bernarda@microsoft.com> Thu, 09 September 2010 19:52 UTC

Return-Path: <bernarda@microsoft.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873A13A682A for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:52:24 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -11.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-11.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DkBUUX5IKQPH for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:52:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.microsoft.com (smtp.microsoft.com [131.107.115.212]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A04CD3A6922 for <martini@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:52:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) by TK5-EXGWY-E801.partners.extranet.microsoft.com (10.251.56.50) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.176.0; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:52:48 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com (157.54.71.39) by TK5EX14HUBC103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com (157.54.86.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.218.10; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:52:48 -0700
Received: from TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([169.254.3.205]) by TK5EX14MLTW651.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com ([157.54.71.39]) with mapi; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 12:52:48 -0700
From: Bernard Aboba <bernarda@microsoft.com>
To: Richard Shockey <richard@shockey.us>
Thread-Topic: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
Thread-Index: ActQJThfzBE9Z3zRS9apBHnFAW9DRwAM3jig
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:54:10 +0000
Message-ID: <CE533E00513707468FD1CBBE51856FB2024DC5F0@TK5EX14MBXW653.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com>
References: <BLU137-W878D9ABB4B6A396E0682493860@phx.gbl>, <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA89F9@gbplmail01.genband.com> <BLU137-W122E29863A150E6483B96893870@phx.gbl> <B59189B7-671D-4627-9B78-4A60213D2475@cisco.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA8E49@gbplmail01.genband.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE214CC0BBF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA92EC@gbplmail01.genband.com> <4C7E6528.1060900@nostrum.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05850165E917@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C7DC5847@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <008d01cb5025$39f4aee0$adde0ca0$@us>
In-Reply-To: <008d01cb5025$39f4aee0$adde0ca0$@us>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:52:24 -0000

+1 (speaking as an individual).  

-----Original Message-----
From: Richard Shockey [mailto:richard@shockey.us] 
Sent: Thursday, September 09, 2010 6:45 AM
To: 'Elwell, John'; 'Christer Holmberg'; 'Adam Roach'; 'Brian Lindsay'
Cc: 'DRAGE, Keith (Keith)'; martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

And to restate my position the preferred bar should be "SP SHOULD support"
vs MUST support for Public GRUU's 

-----Original Message-----
From: martini-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Elwell, John
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:30 AM
To: Christer Holmberg; Adam Roach; Brian Lindsay
Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

Christer,

REQ-16 is satisfied, since the mechanism does allow this. What we are
discussing is whether the SP MUST support that mechanism.

John
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: martini-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: 07 September 2010 13:31
> To: Adam Roach; Brian Lindsay
> Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); martini@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>Also, what precludes usage of GRUU's internally within 
> >>an enterprise as long as the PBX doesn't send them towards 
> >>the network?
> > 
> >That kinda defeats the purpose of using GRUUs.
> 
> We do have a requirement saying:
> 
>  REQ16:  The mechanism MUST allow the SIP-PBX to provide its UAs with
>            public or temporary Globally Routable UA URIs (GRUUs)
>            [RFC5627].
> 
> So, doesn't that mean that unless the GRUUs are provided by 
> the SSP, the PBX has to generate them itself?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
> 
_______________________________________________
martini mailing list
martini@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email