Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

"Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us> Thu, 09 September 2010 13:44 UTC

Return-Path: <richard@shockey.us>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CB7A3A6898 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 06:44:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.285
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.285 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.020, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KkRTpnjSNnPk for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 06:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com (oproxy2-pub.bluehost.com [67.222.39.60]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 8D79F3A681E for <martini@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2010 06:44:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail 18313 invoked by uid 0); 9 Sep 2010 13:45:15 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO box462.bluehost.com) (74.220.219.62) by oproxy2.bluehost.com with SMTP; 9 Sep 2010 13:45:15 -0000
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=shockey.us; h=Received:From:To:Cc:References:In-Reply-To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:Thread-Index:Content-Language:X-Identified-User; b=kxwSrL+oJcdS4JgBL3QvzT8oPJT1BhgyJYzoRqV2KNVfQlbwGc4lGRpxKDqbwGvbGxDhRsaMTKTlw2YoWoUVYVjESQK3QrQj7ao5Jv5ThYgraO393m2fpiYuchFoSIxZ;
Received: from pool-173-79-200-247.washdc.fios.verizon.net ([173.79.200.247] helo=RSHOCKEYPC) by box462.bluehost.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <richard@shockey.us>) id 1OthRC-0003Lz-NI; Thu, 09 Sep 2010 07:45:14 -0600
From: "Richard Shockey" <richard@shockey.us>
To: "'Elwell, John'" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>, "'Christer Holmberg'" <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, "'Adam Roach'" <adam@nostrum.com>, "'Brian Lindsay'" <brian.lindsay@genband.com>
References: <BLU137-W878D9ABB4B6A396E0682493860@phx.gbl>, <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA89F9@gbplmail01.genband.com> <BLU137-W122E29863A150E6483B96893870@phx.gbl> <B59189B7-671D-4627-9B78-4A60213D2475@cisco.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA8E49@gbplmail01.genband.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE214CC0BBF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA92EC@gbplmail01.genband.com> <4C7E6528.1060900@nostrum.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05850165E917@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C7DC5847@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C7DC5847@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Date: Thu, 9 Sep 2010 09:45:10 -0400
Message-ID: <008d01cb5025$39f4aee0$adde0ca0$@us>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: ActJ40GHaieZ6/XaQOC/NjHCyi9YzgEpRDEQAAQpFPAAYv3U8A==
Content-Language: en-us
X-Identified-User: {3286:box462.bluehost.com:shockeyu:shockey.us} {sentby:smtp auth 173.79.200.247 authed with richard@shockey.us}
Cc: "'DRAGE, Keith \(Keith\)'" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 13:44:49 -0000

And to restate my position the preferred bar should be "SP SHOULD support"
vs MUST support for Public GRUU's 

-----Original Message-----
From: martini-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
Of Elwell, John
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 10:30 AM
To: Christer Holmberg; Adam Roach; Brian Lindsay
Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

Christer,

REQ-16 is satisfied, since the mechanism does allow this. What we are
discussing is whether the SP MUST support that mechanism.

John
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: martini-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: 07 September 2010 13:31
> To: Adam Roach; Brian Lindsay
> Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); martini@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>Also, what precludes usage of GRUU's internally within 
> >>an enterprise as long as the PBX doesn't send them towards 
> >>the network?
> > 
> >That kinda defeats the purpose of using GRUUs.
> 
> We do have a requirement saying:
> 
>  REQ16:  The mechanism MUST allow the SIP-PBX to provide its UAs with
>            public or temporary Globally Routable UA URIs (GRUUs)
>            [RFC5627].
> 
> So, doesn't that mean that unless the GRUUs are provided by 
> the SSP, the PBX has to generate them itself?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
> 
_______________________________________________
martini mailing list
martini@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini