IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"

<bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com> Wed, 21 July 2010 07:35 UTC

Return-Path: <bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D7853A68B3 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:35:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mxoNfR7tNLze for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com [217.108.152.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 768DD3A681F for <martini@ietf.org>; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:35:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 57AE16C000A; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.192.128.46]) by r-mail1.rd.francetelecom.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4BEB16C0008; Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:36:16 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr ([10.192.128.56]) by ftrdsmtp1.rd.francetelecom.fr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959); Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:35:52 +0200
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 09:35:50 +0200
Message-ID: <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101B1ECEF@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr>
In-Reply-To: <430FC6BDED356B4C8498F634416644A9258D7F3A57@mail>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
Thread-Index: AcsoIcTgTg+jMHVnTxyi6qCUI4QITgAAfBawAAYwBTAAGpPdsA==
References: <BLU137-W168F37C34E4BA034704B8893BB0@phx.gbl><9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101AEE888@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr><000001cb2758$9c977cd0$d5c67670$@us><A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CAECBA4A08@MCHP058A.global-ad.net><B011440129B84B30978779D2BCA75D18@china.huawei.com><9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101B1EBC5@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr><4C45C316.1090702@nostrum.com> <9ECCF01B52E7AB408A7EB8535264214101B1EC01@ftrdmel0.rd.francetelecom.fr> <430FC6BDED356B4C8498F634416644A9258D7F3A57@mail>
From: bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com
To: HKaplan@acmepacket.com, adam@nostrum.com
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 21 Jul 2010 07:35:52.0123 (UTC) FILETIME=[589880B0:01CB28A7]
Cc: bernard_aboba@hotmail.com, martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 21 Jul 2010 07:35:51 -0000

 

> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : Hadriel Kaplan [mailto:HKaplan@acmepacket.com] 
> Envoyé : mardi 20 juillet 2010 20:56
> À : CHATRAS Bruno RD-CORE-ISS; adam@nostrum.com
> Cc : bernard_aboba@hotmail.com; martini@ietf.org
> Objet : RE: [martini] REMINDER: Ongoing MARTINI WG lastCall 
> on"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the SIP"
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: martini-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On 
> > Behalf Of bruno.chatras@orange-ftgroup.com
> > Sent: Tuesday, July 20, 2010 11:59 AM
> > 
> > Yes of course and all other things that one can mix with a 
> Martini as well.
> > However I don't understand how Olive can support the case where 
> > bob@sales.entreprise.com and bob@helpdesk.entreprise.com are two 
> > different persons, both of them being connected to the same 
> PBX (or at 
> > least to what is seen by the SSP as a single PBX) and this 
> PBX has a 
> > single contact address registered with the SSP.
> 
> If the PBX only registered a single contact, then the SSP 
> wouldn't be able to indicate two different target AoR domains 
> - but that's actually a GOOD thing, I think.  Either the PBX 
> knows about the two AoR domains, in which case it should have 
> registered for them separately; 

==>BC: Of course it can register them separately (especially if there are only two sub-domains) but why should we mandate this behavior while there are other more flexible solutions that do not have this constraint? 

or else it doesn't, in which 
> case we shouldn't be sending two different domains to it.  
> That was one of the main points of GIN, imo: don't send 
> something to the PBX it doesn't expect to receive.



> 
> -hadriel 
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email