Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com> Fri, 10 September 2010 11:54 UTC
Return-Path: <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9FD13A6814 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.608
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.608 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.991, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tKeL9U3omI0j for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:54:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (mailgw10.se.ericsson.net [193.180.251.61]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 934463A67E5 for <martini@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 04:54:34 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb3d-b7b90ae00000278d-5e-4c8a1c9489fa
Received: from esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125]) by mailgw10.se.ericsson.net (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id 9A.F2.10125.49C1A8C4; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:55:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.84) by esessmw0184.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.81) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.2.234.1; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:55:00 +0200
Received: from ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se ([169.254.1.78]) by esessmw0191.eemea.ericsson.se ([153.88.115.84]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:55:00 +0200
From: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>, Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 13:54:59 +0200
Thread-Topic: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
Thread-Index: ActQ1uhvHKdpO9CwTQKoFU+OIQjNGAAB9TUw
Message-ID: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A058501694CB5@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <BLU137-W302E72474ED981657F995E93700@phx.gbl> <639A51A244A4422B99A6510D6EC6C1A5@china.huawei.com> <E55DE5D3-DB52-453F-A3A4-5D24909B3A07@acmepacket.com>
In-Reply-To: <E55DE5D3-DB52-453F-A3A4-5D24909B3A07@acmepacket.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Brightmail-Tracker: AAAAAA==
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:54:36 -0000
Hi, If we say MAY, than we could list every other SIP draft/RFC also, and say that the SSP MAY implement them... I agree with Hadriel, that either it's required or not. If we use SHOULD, then we need to say when it applies and when it doesn't. Regards, Christer > -----Original Message----- > From: martini-bounces@ietf.org > [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan > Sent: 10. syyskuuta 2010 13:57 > To: Spencer Dawkins > Cc: Bernard Aboba; martini@ietf.org > Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support > for Public GRUUs > > > If we make it a SHOULD, what we really mean is MAY. So why > not say what we mean? > Either it's required or it's not. In this case, it's like a > "MUST implement unless you don't want to". That's a MAY. > > -hadriel > > > On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote: > > > Speaking as an individual participant ... > > > > I recognize that public GRUUs are a Good Thing (tm), and I > support at > > least a SHOULD for service provider support of public GRUUs > in the GIN > > protocol specification. > > > > I prefer SHOULD to MUST for service provider support of > public GRUUs, > > because we have applications where public GRUUs are not absolutely > > required - for example, SIP connect 1.1 is using third-party call > > control where public GRUUs might also be used. > > > > Spencer > > > > _______________________________________________ > > martini mailing list > > martini@ietf.org > > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini > > _______________________________________________ > martini mailing list > martini@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini >
- [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support f… Bernard Aboba
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Bharrat, Shaun
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Spencer Dawkins
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Hadriel Kaplan
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Christer Holmberg
- Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Suppo… Brian Lindsay