Re: [martini] Question on martini-gin & Outbound (RFC5626)

Martien Huysmans <martien.huysmans@ericsson.com> Thu, 04 November 2010 08:17 UTC

From: Martien Huysmans <martien.huysmans@ericsson.com>
To: "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 04 Nov 2010 09:17:48 +0100
Thread-Topic: Question on martini-gin & Outbound (RFC5626)
Thread-Index: Act52Usw4BmKNH9/RwqtVL5yhKTFBAAhZqugAGWWpBA=
Message-ID: <B1771F0F1F97A8478E2F449EA19CC7C5DA59D070@ESESSCMS0365.eemea.ericsson.se>
References: <B1771F0F1F97A8478E2F449EA19CC7C5DA568144@ESESSCMS0365.eemea.ericsson.se> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA02355462F4@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
In-Reply-To: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA02355462F4@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [martini] Question on martini-gin & Outbound (RFC5626)
Precedence: list

John

Does the exceptional use case apply in case of a PBX using MARTINI-GIN?

Related question.
Assuming that the 'ob' is added by the PBX, I assume that the PBX also needs
to remove it in requests towards the PBX-device. Do you agree?
If so the PBX would need to Record-Route.

Related question:
In the use case that we are discussing, the Proxy updates the Contact for the initial request, before forwarding it to the next hop. I have never seen such a use case. Do you know of any similar use cases?

/Martien

-----Original Message-----
From: Elwell, John [mailto:john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 8:31 AM
To: Martien Huysmans; martini@ietf.org
Subject: RE: Question on martini-gin & Outbound (RFC5626)

Martien,

Assuming the INVITE request is forwarded to the SP over the flow established at registration time, there would be no need to add the 'ob' parameter. Inclusion of the 'ob' parameter in the Contact header field is only for exceptional cases where there is no registration flow that can be used. The procedures of 4.3 of RFC 5626 would seem to apply.

John


> -----Original Message-----
> From: martini-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martien Huysmans
> Sent: 01 November 2010 15:27
> To: martini@ietf.org
> Subject: [martini] Question on martini-gin & Outbound (RFC5626)
> 
> Consider the following use case
> 
> -           PBX-device has registered without Outbound
> 
> -           PBX has registered with Outbound.
> 
> PBX-device creates an INVITE with Contact header field value 
> and sends that
> 
> to the PBX. The PBX acting as proxy wants to forward the 
> INVITE to the SSP 
> 
> over the flow used for registration.
> 
> Question: does the PBX need to add an "ob" parameter to the 
> Contact header?
> 
>  
> 
> Regards Martien
> 
> line
> 
> MARTIEN HUYSMANS Ir 
> System Engineer 
> 
> 
> Ericsson
> ETM/DAB
> Ericssonstraat 2
> 5121 ML RIJEN, Netherlands
> Phone +31 161 24 9941
> Fax +31 (0)161 24 99 22
> Mobile +31 6 5120 3734
> martien.huysmans@ericsson.com
> www.ericsson.com 
> 
> 
> 
> http://www.ericsson.com/ <http://www.ericsson.com/> 
> 
>  
> 
> This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive 
> email on the basis of the terms set out at 
> www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer 
> 
>  
> 
>

[martini] Question on martini-gin & Outbound (RFC… Martien Huysmans
Re: [martini] Question on martini-gin & Outbound … Elwell, John
Re: [martini] Question on martini-gin & Outbound … Martien Huysmans
Re: [martini] Question on martini-gin & Outbound … Elwell, John