Re: [martini] New text for gin section 7.1.1 first paragraph

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 28 September 2010 17:10 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4CEC3A6B5A for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:10:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.553
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.553 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.046, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6rxXWBjD6k0U for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:10:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B105A3A6B6C for <martini@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2010 10:10:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydra-3.local (ppp-70-249-149-233.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [70.249.149.233]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o8SHB2lm087694 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:11:03 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4CA221A6.3060801@nostrum.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 12:11:02 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Paul Kyzivat <pkyzivat@cisco.com>
References: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C81C2B32@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <B1771F0F1F97A8478E2F449EA19CC7C5DA1A7EB3@ESESSCMS0365.eemea.ericsson.se> <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C81C2D93@MCHP058A.global-ad.net> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E425B8D6F6@gbplmail02.genband.com> <4CA21DF2.5080709@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4CA21DF2.5080709@cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] New text for gin section 7.1.1 first paragraph
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2010 17:10:43 -0000

  On 9/28/10 11:55, Sep 28, Paul Kyzivat wrote:
>
>
> On 9/28/2010 12:34 PM, Brian Lindsay wrote:
>> Hi John/all,
>>
>>     Whether support for routing of out-of-dialog requests to a 
>> contact is required should depend on the service offering of the SSP. 
>> For example, SSP support for an out-of-dialog REFER to a contact URI 
>> shouldn't be considered mandatory as discussed previously. As such, I 
>> think the text proposed should be conditional based on whether such 
>> services are supported by the SSP across it's interfaces.
>
> This implies that the SSP knows and controls all the services that may 
> be used with its customers.

Paul is 100% correct -- many services in the SIP network are handled 
exclusively by the UAs, with no need for intermediaries to perform any 
special processing at all. The SSP cannot possibly know all the services 
that the UAs are capable of.

/a