IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com> Mon, 30 August 2010 20:12 UTC

Return-Path: <fluffy@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AD663A684C for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:12:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.494
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.494 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.105, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iQbXFflQ+GNV for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sj-iport-3.cisco.com (sj-iport-3.cisco.com [171.71.176.72]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4419A3A6858 for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:12:48 -0700 (PDT)
Authentication-Results: sj-iport-3.cisco.com; dkim=neutral (message not signed) header.i=none
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmQFAG+te0yrR7H+/2dsb2JhbACTTo0ccaMtm2qFNwSEO4VO
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.56,294,1280707200"; d="scan'208";a="236111092"
Received: from sj-core-2.cisco.com ([171.71.177.254]) by sj-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2010 20:13:19 +0000
Received: from [192.168.4.177] (rcdn-fluffy-8711.cisco.com [10.99.9.18]) by sj-core-2.cisco.com (8.13.8/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o7UKDIQE020883 for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:13:18 GMT
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Impp: xmpp:cullenfluffyjennings@jabber.org
From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <BLU137-W122E29863A150E6483B96893870@phx.gbl>
Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 14:13:18 -0600
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <B59189B7-671D-4627-9B78-4A60213D2475@cisco.com>
References: <BLU137-W878D9ABB4B6A396E0682493860@phx.gbl>, <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA89F9@gbplmail01.genband.com> <BLU137-W122E29863A150E6483B96893870@phx.gbl>
To: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081)
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:12:50 -0000

GIN breaks significant parts of SIP without GRUUs (or some equivalent functionality) so I think we need GRUUs to be required to be implement on the SSP side of GIN. 


On Aug 28, 2010, at 1:44 PM, Bernard Aboba wrote:

> At the IETF 78 MARTINI WG meeting, during the discussion of Ticket 57 (relating to temporary GRUUs), a suggestion was made that public GRUUs be mandatory to implement for SSPs.  
> 
> We will now attempt to determine whether consensus exists within the MARTINI WG to make this change to the document. 
> 
> Please respond to this email and post your opinion as to whether you agree that SSPs supporting MARTINI MUST implement support for public GRUUs. 
> 
> This consensus call will last until September 12, 2010.  
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini


Cullen Jennings
For corporate legal information go to:
http://www.cisco.com/web/about/doing_business/legal/cri/index.html

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email