Re: [martini] Summary of Consensus Call on Public GRUU language

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Tue, 19 October 2010 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51B003A6BF8 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:23:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.383
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.383 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.216, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Oayjhy5tIP5E for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:23:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C9B23A6C08 for <martini@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Oct 2010 18:22:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from hydra-3.local (ppp-70-242-117-72.dsl.rcsntx.swbell.net [70.242.117.72]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o9J1OFt1097101 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:24:15 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4CBCF33F.4040105@nostrum.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Oct 2010 20:24:15 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.9) Gecko/20100915 Thunderbird/3.1.4
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>
References: <BLU104-W290B4D0045C7E1B240F466935B0@phx.gbl>
In-Reply-To: <BLU104-W290B4D0045C7E1B240F466935B0@phx.gbl>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------080302090806010701020509"
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 70.242.117.72 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] Summary of Consensus Call on Public GRUU language
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Oct 2010 01:23:09 -0000

  The new -10 version of the draft reflects the result of this consensus 
call. I believe that this version is ready to send to the IESG for 
publication.

New version:
     http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-martini-gin-10.txt

Diffs:
     http://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-martini-gin-10.txt

/a

On 10/18/10 19:21, Oct 18, Bernard Aboba wrote:
> The MARTINI WG Consensus Call on Public GRUU language has now concluded:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02017.html
>
> Three options were presented to the WG:
>
> (1)  No change (public GRUU support remains optional).
>
> (2) Change the MAY to: "The SSP SHOULD support the public GRUU 
> mechanism described in this section."
>
> (3)  Change the MAY to:  "The SSP MUST support the public GRUU 
> mechanism described in this section, unless the SSP has other means of 
> providing globally routable contact URIs."
>
> Seventeen individuals responded to the consensus call.  Of these, 13 
> indicated a preference for Option 1.
>
> Four individuals indicated a preference for Option 2; seven 
> individuals indicated Option 2 as a second choice or "OK" option.
>
> Five individuals indicated Option 3 as their preferred option.
>
> Given that the most popular choice was for public GRUU support to 
> remain optional (the original language prior to IETF 78),
> it does not appear that there is WG consensus to change the text.
>
>
> ===============================================
>
>
> *Individual* 	*Option 1* 	*Option 2* 	*Option 3* 	*URL*
> Andrew Allen 	
> 	
> 	1 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02018.html
> Keith Drage 	
> 	
> 	1 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02019.html
> Richard Shockey 	1 	2 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02020.html
> Hadriel Kaplan 	1 	1 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02021.html
> Martin Dolly 	1 	1 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02022.html
> Paul Kyzivat 	
> 	1 	1 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02023.html
> Adam Roach 	
> 	2 	1 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02024.html
> John Elwell 	1 	1 	1 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02025.html
> David Hancock 	1 	2 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02026.html
> Jack Burton 	1 	
> 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02027.html
> Bernard Aboba 	1 	2 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02028.html
> Shida Schubert 	1 	2 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02029.html
> Shaun Barrat 	1 	2 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02030.html
> Doug Sauder 	1 	2 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02031.html
> Alan Johnston 	1 	
> 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02032.html
> Brian Lindsay 	1 	
> 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02033.html
> Martien Huysmans 	1 	
> 	
> 	http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg02034.html
>
> 	
> 	
> 	
> 	
> Total Preferred 	*13* 	*4* 	*5* 	**
> Total Second choice 	*7* 	
> 	
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini