[martini] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6140 (3144)

RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org> Thu, 01 March 2012 21:44 UTC

Return-Path: <wwwrun@rfc-editor.org>
X-Original-To: martini@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B44BC21F8A2A for <martini@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:44:56 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.311
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.311 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.289, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id pC7R54zgTnP8 for <martini@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:44:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from rfc-editor.org (rfc-editor.org [IPv6:2001:1890:123a::1:2f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3A2CF21E8036 for <martini@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:44:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: by rfc-editor.org (Postfix, from userid 30) id CC43BB1E004; Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:39:13 -0800 (PST)
To: adam@nostrum.com, gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com, rjsparks@nostrum.com, Bernard_Aboba@hotmail.com, spencer@wonderhamster.org
From: RFC Errata System <rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org>
Message-Id: <20120301213913.CC43BB1E004@rfc-editor.org>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2012 13:39:13 -0800 (PST)
Cc: martini@ietf.org, rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org
Subject: [martini] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC6140 (3144)
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2012 21:44:56 -0000

The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6140,
"Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)".

--------------------------------------
You may review the report below and at:
http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata_search.php?rfc=6140&eid=3144

--------------------------------------
Type: Technical
Reported by: David Hancock <d.hancock@cablelabs.com>

Section: 5.2

Original Text
-------------
<none -- new text being added>

Corrected Text
--------------
<Insert following new paragraph between existing 2nd and 3rd paragraph>

The registrar MUST populate the Contact header field of the 200 (OK) response
to REGISTER only with the explicitly registered Contact URIs identified in the
REGISTER request (i.e., for bulk number registration, the Contact URIs
containing the “bnc” parameter). The Contact header field of the 200 (OK)
response MUST NOT contain the multiple contact addresses that are implicitly
created by the bulk number registration procedure. 

Notes
-----
The proposed text clarifies how the MUST statement in RFC 3261 section 10.3 item-8 applies in the case of bulk number registration.

RFC 3261 section 10.3 item-8 says ...
8. The registrar returns a 200 (OK) response.  The response MUST
   contain Contact header field values enumerating all current
   bindings.  <... text deleted...>

For bulk number registration, this means that the Contact header field in the 200 (OK) response to REGISTER contains the Contact URI with the "bnc" parameter, and not the multiple derived contact URIs that are bound to the multiple E.164 numbers associated with the registering PBX.

Instructions:
-------------
This errata is currently posted as "Reported". If necessary, please
use "Reply All" to discuss whether it should be verified or
rejected. When a decision is reached, the verifying party (IESG)
can log in to change the status and edit the report, if necessary. 

--------------------------------------
RFC6140 (draft-ietf-martini-gin-13)
--------------------------------------
Title               : Registration for Multiple Phone Numbers in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)
Publication Date    : March 2011
Author(s)           : A.B. Roach
Category            : PROPOSED STANDARD
Source              : Multiple AoR reachabiliTy InformatioN Indication
Area                : Real-time Applications and Infrastructure
Stream              : IETF
Verifying Party     : IESG