Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 01 September 2010 14:37 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C353A69D0 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:37:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.72
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.72 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.120, BAYES_00=-2.599, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 5DNTqrLk2jKs for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:37:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nostrum.com (nostrum-pt.tunnel.tserv2.fmt.ipv6.he.net [IPv6:2001:470:1f03:267::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 08F093A69A2 for <martini@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Sep 2010 07:37:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dn3-228.estacado.net (vicuna-alt.estacado.net [75.53.54.121]) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id o81EbScb073378 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 1 Sep 2010 09:37:29 -0500 (CDT) (envelope-from adam@nostrum.com)
Message-ID: <4C7E6528.1060900@nostrum.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 09:37:28 -0500
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.8) Gecko/20100802 Thunderbird/3.1.2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Brian Lindsay <brian.lindsay@genband.com>
References: <BLU137-W878D9ABB4B6A396E0682493860@phx.gbl>, <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA89F9@gbplmail01.genband.com> <BLU137-W122E29863A150E6483B96893870@phx.gbl> <B59189B7-671D-4627-9B78-4A60213D2475@cisco.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA8E49@gbplmail01.genband.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE214CC0BBF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA92EC@gbplmail01.genband.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA92EC@gbplmail01.genband.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Received-SPF: pass (nostrum.com: 75.53.54.121 is authenticated by a trusted mechanism)
Cc: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2010 14:37:14 -0000

  On 9/1/10 9:28 AM, Brian Lindsay wrote:
>    Also, what precludes usage of GRUU's internally within an enterprise as long as the PBX doesn't send them towards the network?

That kinda defeats the purpose of using GRUUs.

/a