Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

"Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com> Tue, 07 September 2010 14:29 UTC

Return-Path: <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D2B03A6905 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:29:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.674
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.674 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.075, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6Tr3nUTrGCEA for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:29:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ms03.m0019.fra.mmp.de.bt.com (m0019.fra.mmp.de.bt.com [62.180.227.30]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BDE633A6914 for <martini@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 07:29:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from senmx11-mx ([62.134.46.9] [62.134.46.9]) by ms03.m0020.fra.mmp.de.bt.com with ESMTP id BT-MMP-1414394; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:30:00 +0200
Received: from MCHP063A.global-ad.net (unknown [172.29.37.61]) by senmx11-mx (Server) with ESMTP id A32F51EB82B4; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:30:00 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from MCHP058A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.55]) by MCHP063A.global-ad.net ([172.29.37.61]) with mapi; Tue, 7 Sep 2010 16:30:00 +0200
From: "Elwell, John" <john.elwell@siemens-enterprise.com>
To: Christer Holmberg <christer.holmberg@ericsson.com>, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>, Brian Lindsay <brian.lindsay@genband.com>
Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:29:59 +0200
Thread-Topic: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
Thread-Index: ActJ40GHaieZ6/XaQOC/NjHCyi9YzgEpRDEQAAQpFPA=
Message-ID: <A444A0F8084434499206E78C106220CA01C7DC5847@MCHP058A.global-ad.net>
References: <BLU137-W878D9ABB4B6A396E0682493860@phx.gbl>, <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA89F9@gbplmail01.genband.com> <BLU137-W122E29863A150E6483B96893870@phx.gbl> <B59189B7-671D-4627-9B78-4A60213D2475@cisco.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA8E49@gbplmail01.genband.com> <EDC0A1AE77C57744B664A310A0B23AE214CC0BBF@FRMRSSXCHMBSC3.dc-m.alcatel-lucent.com> <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E414EA92EC@gbplmail01.genband.com> <4C7E6528.1060900@nostrum.com> <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05850165E917@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
In-Reply-To: <7F2072F1E0DE894DA4B517B93C6A05850165E917@ESESSCMS0356.eemea.ericsson.se>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "DRAGE, Keith (Keith)" <keith.drage@alcatel-lucent.com>, "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Sep 2010 14:29:53 -0000

Christer,

REQ-16 is satisfied, since the mechanism does allow this. What we are discussing is whether the SP MUST support that mechanism.

John
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: martini-bounces@ietf.org 
> [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: 07 September 2010 13:31
> To: Adam Roach; Brian Lindsay
> Cc: DRAGE, Keith (Keith); martini@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [martini] Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
> 
> 
> Hi,
> 
> >>Also, what precludes usage of GRUU's internally within 
> >>an enterprise as long as the PBX doesn't send them towards 
> >>the network?
> > 
> >That kinda defeats the purpose of using GRUUs.
> 
> We do have a requirement saying:
> 
>  REQ16:  The mechanism MUST allow the SIP-PBX to provide its UAs with
>            public or temporary Globally Routable UA URIs (GRUUs)
>            [RFC5627].
> 
> So, doesn't that mean that unless the GRUUs are provided by 
> the SSP, the PBX has to generate them itself?
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Christer
> 
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini
>