Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs

Brian Lindsay <brian.lindsay@genband.com> Fri, 10 September 2010 16:18 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.lindsay@genband.com>
X-Original-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: martini@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 93DEA3A6808 for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.413
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.413 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.186, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2eXDIj9XU-3F for <martini@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from exprod7og102.obsmtp.com (exprod7og102.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.157]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19FEF3A6880 for <martini@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from source ([63.149.188.88]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob102.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKTIpaaJRSmeM1+Oh75oQ9oub3airD6z5a@postini.com; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 09:18:55 PDT
Received: from owa.genband.com ([172.16.21.97]) by mail.genband.com over TLS secured channel with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:18:43 -0500
Received: from GBEX02.genband.com (172.16.21.98) by GBEX01.genband.com (172.16.21.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.0.702.0; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:18:43 -0500
Received: from GBPLMAIL01.genband.com ([fe80::70bf:29d1:2cfe:42b5]) by gbex02.genband.com ([fe80::350f:45df:8dbd:4b0e%15]) with mapi; Fri, 10 Sep 2010 11:18:43 -0500
From: Brian Lindsay <brian.lindsay@genband.com>
To: Hadriel Kaplan <HKaplan@acmepacket.com>, Spencer Dawkins <spencer@wonderhamster.org>
Thread-Topic: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
Thread-Index: ActQ1uhvmRCGsiTQRU6muhJBHmriVwALEJIA
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:18:41 +0000
Message-ID: <F1A0ED6425368141998E077AC43334E4258DDB7F@gbplmail01.genband.com>
References: <BLU137-W302E72474ED981657F995E93700@phx.gbl> <639A51A244A4422B99A6510D6EC6C1A5@china.huawei.com> <E55DE5D3-DB52-453F-A3A4-5D24909B3A07@acmepacket.com>
In-Reply-To: <E55DE5D3-DB52-453F-A3A4-5D24909B3A07@acmepacket.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 10 Sep 2010 16:18:43.0573 (UTC) FILETIME=[D6812250:01CB5103]
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: SMEX-8.0.0.4160-6.500.1024-17628.003
X-TM-AS-Result: No--14.531800-5.000000-31
X-TM-AS-User-Approved-Sender: No
X-TM-AS-User-Blocked-Sender: No
Cc: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba@hotmail.com>, "martini@ietf.org" <martini@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs
X-BeenThere: martini@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of en-mass SIP PBX registration mechanisms <martini.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini>
List-Post: <mailto:martini@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini>, <mailto:martini-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2010 16:18:28 -0000

Hi,

   We could just introduce the text that was proposed in this post:

http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01829.html

-----Original Message-----
From: martini-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:martini-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hadriel Kaplan
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2010 6:57 AM
To: Spencer Dawkins
Cc: Bernard Aboba; martini@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [martini] REMINDER: Call for Consensus: Support for Public GRUUs


If we make it a SHOULD, what we really mean is MAY.  So why not say what we mean?
Either it's required or it's not.  In this case, it's like a "MUST implement unless you don't want to".  That's a MAY.

-hadriel


On Sep 9, 2010, at 4:24 PM, Spencer Dawkins wrote:

> Speaking as an individual participant ...
> 
> I recognize that public GRUUs are a Good Thing (tm), and I support at least 
> a SHOULD for service provider support of public GRUUs in the GIN protocol 
> specification.
> 
> I prefer SHOULD to MUST for service provider support of public GRUUs, 
> because we have applications where public GRUUs are not absolutely 
> required - for example, SIP connect 1.1 is using third-party call control 
> where public GRUUs might also be used.
> 
> Spencer 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> martini mailing list
> martini@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini

_______________________________________________
martini mailing list
martini@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/martini