Re: [martini] Consensus Call Summary: Support for Public GRUUs

["Elwell, John" <[e-mail]>]

The only relevant requirement in RFC 5947 is:
"REQ16:  The mechanism MUST allow the SIP-PBX to provide its UAs with
           public or temporary Globally Routable UA URIs (GRUUs)
           [RFC5627]."

This mandates that a mechanism be available, and GIN satisfies this, whether or not GIN places a requirement on the SSP at MUST strength, SHOULD strength or MAY strength. So one could argue that we don't have a requirement for MUST strength.

John 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [e-mail] 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Christer Holmberg
> Sent: 13 September 2010 13:27
> To: Bernard Aboba; [e-mail]
> Subject: Re: [martini] Consensus Call Summary: Support for 
> Public GRUUs
> 
> Hi,
>  
> Do we, or do we not, have a requirement which would be 
> fullfilled by using GRUU?
>  
> Regards,
>  
> Christer
> 
> 
> ________________________________
> 
> 	From: [e-mail] 
> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of Bernard Aboba
> 	Sent: 13. syyskuuta 2010 15:15
> 	To: [e-mail]
> 	Subject: [martini] Consensus Call Summary: Support for 
> Public GRUUs
> 	
> 	
> 
> 	Based on the responses to the list (summary below), 
> there does not appear to be MARTINI WG consensus for the 
> proposed change. 
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	A number of the "against" postings suggested SHOULD so 
> a separate discussion may be needed to iron that out. 
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	Public GRUU summary
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	For MUST:
> 
> 	Cullen Jennings: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01865.html
> 
> 	Paul Kyzivat: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01860.html
> 
> 	Andrew Allen: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01855.html
> 
> 	Mary Barnes: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01858.html
> 
> 	Adam Roach: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01857.html
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	Against MUST:
> 
> 	Brian Lindsay: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01856.html
> 
> 	Hadriel Kaplan: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01896.html
> 
> 	Richard Shockey: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01890.html
> 
> 	Alan Johnston: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01892.html
> 
> 	Bernard Aboba: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01891.html
> 
> 	Shaun Bharrat: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01886.html
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	Couldn't classify based on posting:
> 
> 	John Elwell: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01874.html
> 
> 	Keith Drage: 
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/martini/current/msg01871.html
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	
> ==============================================================
> =========
> 
> 	*	From: Bernard Aboba <bernard_aboba at 
> hotmail.com <mailto:[e-mail]> > 
> 	*	To: <martini at ietf.org 
> <mailto:[e-mail]> > 
> 	*	Date: Sat, 28 Aug 2010 12:44:08 -0700 
> 
> 	 
> 
> 	At the IETF 78 MARTINI WG meeting, during the 
> discussion of Ticket 57 (relating to temporary GRUUs), a 
> suggestion was made that public GRUUs be mandatory to 
> implement for SSPs.  
> 	
> 	We will now attempt to determine whether consensus 
> exists within the MARTINI WG to make this change to the document. 
> 	
> 	Please respond to this email and post your opinion as 
> to whether you agree that SSPs supporting MARTINI MUST 
> implement support for public GRUUs. 
> 	
> 	This consensus call will last until September 12, 2010. 
> 
>