Re: [Masque] Adoption call for "The CONNECT-UDP HTTP Method"

Thanks Mike and Roy.

I've written up your points in the following GitHub issue:
https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/masque-drafts/issues/29

Since you consider this non-adoption-blocking, we can work on fixing it
post-adoption.

David

On Thu, Aug 13, 2020 at 1:18 PM Roy T. Fielding <fielding@gbiv.com> wrote:

> I don’t want to give folks the impression that this is a requirement in
> httpbis. It has been a requirement of HTTP/1.1 since 1995 and that will not
> change in this revision.
>
> The short answer is that if a new method is defined, it must use a full
> URI or its absolute path as the request target.
>
> No further exceptions are allowed by HTTP because intermediaries need to
> process messages even when they don’t know the method definition.
>
> .....Roy
>
>
> On Aug 13, 2020, at 6:42 AM, Mike Bishop <mbishop@evequefou.be> wrote:
>
> 
>
> Late to the party, since I've been offline.  I support adoption for the
> spirit of the solution, have already provided some comments on the specific
> draft, and will doubtless have more.  My key piece of feedback remains that draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics
> prohibits
> <https://httpwg.org/http-core/draft-ietf-httpbis-semantics-latest.html#target.resource>
> the request target form used in this draft, so we’ll need to hash that out
> with the HTTP WG.
>
>
>
> However, there are two special, method-specific forms allowed for the
> request target in specific circumstances:
>
> ·        For CONNECT (Section 8.3.6), the request target is the host name
> and port number of the tunnel destination, separated by a colon.
>
> ·        For OPTIONS (Section 8.3.7), the request target can be a single
> asterisk ("*").
>
> See the respective method definitions for details. These forms MUST NOT be
> used with other methods.
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Masque <masque-bounces@ietf.org> On Behalf Of Christopher Wood
> Sent: Wednesday, July 29, 2020 8:49 AM
> To: masque@ietf.org
> Subject: [Masque] Adoption call for "The CONNECT-UDP HTTP Method"
>
>
>
> During yesterday's MASQUE WG meeting, there was strong support in favor of
> adopting draft-schinazi-masque-connect-udp as a WG item. To that end, this
> email begins the call for adoption of the document, in its current form, as
> a starting point. We expect to work through the issues raised both in the
> meeting and on the list going forward.
>
>
>
> Please let the WG know if you support adoption, and if so, are willing to
> contribute to the discussion and review drafts. If you oppose adoption,
> please explain why.
>
>
>
> The document may be found here:
>
>
>
>    https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-schinazi-masque-connect-udp/
>
>
>
> And the source may be found here:
>
>
>
>    https://github.com/DavidSchinazi/masque-drafts
>
>
>
> This call for adoption will conclude on August 14.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Chris and Eric
>
>
>
> --
>
> Masque mailing list
>
> Masque@ietf.org
>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>
> --
> Masque mailing list
> Masque@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>