Re: [Masque] Andrew Alston's No Objection on draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp-14: (with COMMENT)

[David Schinazi <[e-mail]>]

Hi Andrew, thanks for sharing your unease. I agree that some text should be
added here.
Let's continue the conversation in the email thread that responds to Erik's
comment.
David

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 2:29 AM Andrew Alston via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Andrew Alston has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Having reviewed this before reading through other positions, I did walk
> away
> with an uneasy feeling about the security section and was struggling to
> find a
> way to articulate it.  Having said that, and having read the comments in
> other
> ballot positions however, I must support Erik's comments, though I to
> couldn't
> really find a way to formulate a discuss.  Sorry for this comment is a
> little
> obscure!  I think a wider description of the security issues around this
> though
> would make me more comfortable.
>
>
>
>