Re: [Masque] Call for MASQUE use cases

Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> Sat, 22 February 2020 23:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ekr@rtfm.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB6413A0A48 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:14:14 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.896
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.896 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 4Z_YoaxezZRn for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:14:13 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22e.google.com (mail-lj1-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF08E3A0A47 for <masque@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:14:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22e.google.com with SMTP id a13so6003508ljm.10 for <masque@ietf.org>; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:14:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rtfm-com.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=oosbiRIVftZPSEhpe2SssoCO0fqC8vwke4vj5nCLB/Y=; b=XOCyQrQ1xS4RokDYHVul9PPsFVwt5ypoN7XdFOmTEkfy9+e6lCFj1T2xreZVVXqUW/ NGDeamntPrua1fDC2xQgg/u9FmrbqbzI3Qk3qBG7bF3b1pRPMbqA/48+gWss5nELuFgl 3pGBLP08omOAb5qCQ2th4ugDvLgnAegtFdmVCRbs+67DJfhxdAfJF1TlhvxA0l53Byfm Y7o6UuI1GP0J00BXiecot5qoLRYRUGHe9OTl11Moikccvnf5yWiPDCYqqJ/2KD4ZoipD WPhDq6EjIDbwgmPkK5VR0pw+2r3wy40p3FgvYbS+RMLHPLjspZJKfw/0SXg37mtSgY2K L77w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=oosbiRIVftZPSEhpe2SssoCO0fqC8vwke4vj5nCLB/Y=; b=FUdM0MJrg5SHuEElDfqiKmvdqt2UqyLbSvfu1BVstGb9qQ9dRtYcoFS7qOgKcGn1rS SIN+Z76lhKYD06jvPoLutsbUcMKitOJKlOYCl4LY0c7Z+8WreB+87PCFOdIhMHpcBsZJ MRqyfOW0cxjDvZuVmbqECEsmDOYOxy4Uez11CsU7TujGyr5gkgn0TXOrzX+TXMqZgrGg xoY7bPjk+jpTBzNPZArfRp0MI2tSCly2YOMnBEoMx2WW3wX5C/h5luAomKd6MNwfIubK F2YUjrldtiNgte0lYDzjvlbqzJSOFwP5yNzKJPA4ZCgPmazUqQgFZNDnmFcqx+DC5rqM DYtA==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX25kr2LlPwEF2GrAPpYMccmLuq/RILEBsgDl2G1Xlsyu3rbwEk 4wy5T400FQpqIiCIWkhyjJYeP5lJqckFTzwsIsmV+TAwNdE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwF6zg2HrMalB2yyg3reuJ4wnBkV1HKsO6f5CknDeDkRopaxl1xdR1BSD9DQ3JjsBJxWVJYQkwMb09eyETNZIQ=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:8797:: with SMTP id n23mr24475449lji.176.1582413251077; Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:14:11 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <D46D764C-F682-472A-AFDA-32DDF5CA5F6B@heapingbits.net>
In-Reply-To: <D46D764C-F682-472A-AFDA-32DDF5CA5F6B@heapingbits.net>
From: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 15:13:34 -0800
Message-ID: <CABcZeBPMUNgOVWMS_sXPTsCU2R+EaK9JDuZsJQ5KSQROXE+4Sg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
Cc: masque@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000b80086059f324b21"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/KlZ5Tyb1ae7mipQqTjZSNRHtMd8>
Subject: Re: [Masque] Call for MASQUE use cases
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2020 23:14:15 -0000

I am interested in this as an alternative transport for securely proxying
HTTP traffic (cf. https://fpn.firefox.com/)

-Ekr


On Thu, Feb 20, 2020 at 7:13 PM Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
wrote:

> The core MASQUE protocol [1] describes a simple negotiation mechanism
> for various
> applications. However, it omits use cases for these applications. MASQUE
> obfuscation
> in support of a "hidden VPN" service is one use case [2]. Tunneling QUIC
> is another [3].
>
> Given that MASQUE and the upcoming BoF will be successful insofar as it
> addresses important
> use cases, I think it'd be useful to discuss these application use cases
> in more detail
> before Vancouver. To that end, let's use this time before the meeting to
> discuss them!
>
> I'd like to ask interested parties to please surface use cases they know
> of (and care about).
>
> Thanks!
> Chris
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schinazi-masque-02
> [2] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schinazi-masque-obfuscation-00
> [3] https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-kuehlewind-quic-substrate-02
>
> --
> Masque mailing list
> Masque@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>