[Masque] Weekly github digest (MASQUE Working Group summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 10 January 2021 08:21 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D2EA3A0ECB for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:21:05 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.119
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.119 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mnot.net header.b=Z6YvBabj; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=UwQfD0Pa
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0vmy1ZPLD4PV for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF8A13A0ECE for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 00:21:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id A649926FE for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:04:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:04:09 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h= content-type:mime-version:from:to:subject:message-id:date; s= fm1; bh=4TK2/bs3Im4H4NERnbDfN5YshLPA0VNSYkcFOBYTwio=; b=Z6YvBabj fbrFK4dIAwUwLqE80G53Ht1o8ZZbV0xQMe7gWxz5yi+TUBFgVZRLU8cxsWkioKIT 6+NVLM6BdG9r6iGLZwNfROZQBFKPTT29PxD72MO5wDSGEG9Rp9isNtq0BHl+KzTN oLEbfwIOKLSgu4sAJJBN9Yn3ppQE5h7++OQat75bPS3dnI9Bt6/Zd4FIvPdTsBwb SQNmx66wBpvpnjKj1irQ5ShiwMhO+Zs3pNLCm4S9HFastLd6yOpVrpjEcgzUgSU/ eoVmkaflHSCAUyHkVFdu51UJAISmLmKSMwaagnT/A/QKTIkJqu0rhLbfuDW7kWu/ D4X0wm8mAfbvfg==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id :mime-version:subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender :x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm1; bh=4TK2/bs3Im4H4NERnbDfN5YshLPA0 VNSYkcFOBYTwio=; b=UwQfD0PaMD3Ts3Avg0yJb9FsX5SOc2oLqQfTnI+KWk4jB ZYlS1vQPndWB8BPdtXi6LeQLQ1W0pUeWbDsD3WZWTS6imPCUn+Rmav8ba7P8YcL+ fd5Mmroa7T4J1lRC0eL3MoLZSNJWcnaLn0qu2M+ZcRmuf0kCXH2cwKtfrW/cp5ex uE3eoSmpvHH0rAD1BtAI3iivZ96l79JLlWlhDfnG/bZja9DBvH2DjnYgFBke+1/f qZiAntl2lZxH2K/MNOyoHR5OGWJ6joxhYMZcTJzXqhofMM0KxW1J2GWumCgPY8+E ZcAelfBXJaKKBw1BwvmaZeeLmIb/wlEyN+m27LaQg==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:-bT6Xz3M765qM9mzxogxywE5ehVyN7cPwmVNv9r-X4-fAU0-a85uiQ> <xme:-bT6XyHgymO9D4r963y_PQtdIF7p9lthsPP61N_vyCOZd0Tulh6PDn2GUUKxrfHA- eYHDu_m-q--as5zZg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedujedrvdegkedgudduiecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecunecujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtje enucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhihucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicu uehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhiesmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtth gvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeugfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudei teenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrdgtohhmnecukfhppeehvddrvdegvddrledurd duhedvnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgepfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:-bT6Xz5si_YVBoFFFLRy5y6ETlyfscFDkec5Z02i6tNFwIxB2SQqRQ> <xmx:-bT6X402qA6ACfA6RozawPqQq9HItr2icWTUVptUDh3QjNxIqU6EhQ> <xmx:-bT6X2Gs4So5fIsiLpcNuCE8R-LLmYxZS33uitKhaz93jg2sKeKZvg> <xmx:-bT6X4OmSO7s0AZ2Y3fUXg_roZ-v9ejfkNzM-s2A-DEZ_uwrZuwbEg>
Received: from fv-az184-39.internal.cloudapp.net (unknown [52.242.91.152]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id F361D240057 for <masque@ietf.org>; Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:04:08 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============0685564697209789398=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: masque@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20210110080408.F361D240057@mailuser.nyi.internal>
Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 03:04:08 -0500
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/aI_5PpHsvZjwFshzbuowndqJLtw>
Subject: [Masque] Weekly github digest (MASQUE Working Group summary)
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2021 08:21:05 -0000



Issues
------
* ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp (+1/-1/💬3)
  1 issues created:
  - multiplexing flows (by marten-seemann)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/issues/27 

  3 issues received 3 new comments:
  - #27 multiplexing flows (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/issues/27 
  - #23 :scheme (1 by martinthomson)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/issues/23 
  - #8 CONNECT-UDP needs a request target URI (1 by chris-wood)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/issues/8 

  1 issues closed:
  - CONNECT-UDP needs a request target URI https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/issues/8 

* ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs (+0/-14/💬37)
  15 issues received 37 new comments:
  - #16 Clarify terminology  (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/16 
  - #15 Document organisation: which requirement only apply to IP proxying (but not UDP proxying)? (3 by DavidSchinazi, achernya, mirjak)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/15 
  - #14 Non-requirement on IP address extraction (7 by DavidSchinazi, achernya, mirjak)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/14 
  - #13 Requirement on proxying unmodified packets (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/13 
  - #12 IP Assignment and Non-requirement on Address Architecture (10 by DavidSchinazi, achernya, mirjak)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/12 
  - #11 Consider removing load balancing requirement (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/11 
  - #10 Add a requirement for extensibility (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/10 
  - #9 Load balancing over multiple QUIC connections and servers? (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/9 
  - #8 Indistingushible requirement (2 by DavidSchinazi, achernya)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/8 
  - #7 Congestion Control on outer QUIC connection (2 by DavidSchinazi, achernya)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/7 
  - #6 Section 3.10: Flow control control surface (2 by DavidSchinazi, achernya)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/6 
  - #5 Section 3.8: Authorization requirements (2 by DavidSchinazi, achernya)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/5 
  - #4 3.6.  Identity: Whay type of identity? (2 by DavidSchinazi, achernya)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/4 
  - #3 In Network to Network proxying, why does the MASQUE Server need a subnet address? (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/3 
  - #1 Proxying a single IP address, or an IP subnet? (1 by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/1 

  14 issues closed:
  - Document organisation: which requirement only apply to IP proxying (but not UDP proxying)? https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/15 
  - Clarify terminology  https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/16 
  - Non-requirement on IP address extraction https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/14 
  - Requirement on proxying unmodified packets https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/13 
  - Consider removing load balancing requirement https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/11 
  - Add a requirement for extensibility https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/10 
  - Load balancing over multiple QUIC connections and servers? https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/9 
  - Indistingushible requirement https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/8 
  - Congestion Control on outer QUIC connection https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/7 
  - Section 3.10: Flow control control surface https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/6 
  - Section 3.8: Authorization requirements https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/5 
  - 3.6.  Identity: Whay type of identity? https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/4 
  - In Network to Network proxying, why does the MASQUE Server need a subnet address? https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/3 
  - Proxying a single IP address, or an IP subnet? https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/issues/1 



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs (+2/-2/💬0)
  2 pull requests submitted:
  - Editorial pass (by DavidSchinazi)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/pull/18 
  - Incorporate feedback from the IETF 109 session (by achernya)
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/pull/17 

  2 pull requests merged:
  - Editorial pass
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/pull/18 
  - Incorporate feedback from the IETF 109 session
    https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs/pull/17 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp
* https://github.com/ietf-wg-masque/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs