IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] WGLC for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"

Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net> Fri, 04 June 2021 15:30 UTC

Return-Path: <caw@heapingbits.net>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9A0AA3A1693 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 08:30:39 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.8
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.8 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=heapingbits.net header.b=c+EobKXs; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.b=IfWYsN+p
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZZWVvip4-NnF for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 08:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com (wout4-smtp.messagingengine.com [64.147.123.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 807CC3A1690 for <masque@ietf.org>; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 08:30:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44]) by mailout.west.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B0F3416A9; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:30:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from imap4 ([10.202.2.54]) by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 04 Jun 2021 11:30:32 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=heapingbits.net; h=mime-version:message-id:in-reply-to:references:date:from:to :cc:subject:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=fm1; bh=h8 xIL+mI4FSc24a+dSO3MLcr7PL8p5L7bmTenROowTE=; b=c+EobKXsjgNlK/4H+x CXR+1QIdmBwSDPbWjoKqgjVKBn0qkYyN9czIlah9uBncTz6wJe4iRps/jMqIjnT1 0INlw1G3taEW891U3ajymGEOAYf8HYqVPNp8sdcyriFGVhxAnGJQVx6X/Q75nP0u sToiZZpYwjDUpNBxCXEx0dVVkEHTFk9jBR4a3DamhOCidpXYUxYtke6JN2l0i2f9 VBD5o6w9WMP6v3GEjMPiwlsg9LG1PYS9Z7Al5U08Lk+Afv9XTa3k61n2osYpF5Q0 wX7AePW0Cdj8JoqXzuqJ7uDTRbvNRMo8ZtJkp86gW68O4SG2nmjGT5mAS1NnX7s2 wiwA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-transfer-encoding:content-type :date:from:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references :subject:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender :x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; bh=h8xIL+mI4FSc24a+dSO3MLcr7PL8p5L7bmTenROow TE=; b=IfWYsN+pCPm101cen5C220ecKxXlpE2XVZti/rie29FDfyipyvPvE8yDH zyaddGkfuCX2YWOvb5lhgRfcS7RQmoybcQui8t2abhLdlrCauQynxNbb6WfmVpan yOhByhRwvwMCV6ORgvyhdNvpsa0jNEMStEtLuTiZMAjaOxxhyjmdnBOxr1LVe4vq PpUGJaX325bbcArTihQBMvdfAgRnQv/2sWCPC9gBoxJvIJ8jPubbl9Qz/VT4VySz Jde3CvcGlLTBMxnBSzRx/EHTIS01mMPC44BF7sE8dg4o3hHP2vvgZoD7VyI1cHzm 7iAJyw5v9g2UYGzyfNnoXcdeYXx3w==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:F0e6YAaF9m0W_FSSp4OtoTSHGToI2x-nYxpkZi_5UVFjZ3U9knB1oQ> <xme:F0e6YLYj-GoHjCiTN0FlYxvAXV8FMIMelS7520MPTnGzBGhheT_5qBeOYDYJR_f_e ewIrWczLZV9246_ZZY>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeduledrfedtuddgledtucetufdoteggodetrfdotf fvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdfqfgfvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgen uceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttdenucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmne cujfgurhepofgfggfkjghffffhvffutgfgsehtqhertderreejnecuhfhrohhmpedfvehh rhhishhtohhphhgvrhcuhghoohgufdcuoegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvg htqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekffekveeghffgtdffieevudfgledthefhfedvvdeh leeivdegveegleefteejudenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedtnecurfgrrhgrmhepmh grihhlfhhrohhmpegtrgifsehhvggrphhinhhgsghithhsrdhnvght
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:F0e6YK8Q5TLBGsyYFtsmhKeARTGDvPbB2yWlWYRn8ILVgZ9x5f7NRg> <xmx:F0e6YKrAvOBJe8w_OJpV2XFYD25RYpsJIMJFf-_mikIig33VXFMzOw> <xmx:F0e6YLqIcoo3m5K7BfjCleVfWK156s8lL--KlNTBVQqooZozr3Vg9A> <xmx:GEe6YKT0exfTwZlJfGD3YHwGQI2PN_0QDcXi3WRLHV8rMbGhP1AiQw>
Received: by mailuser.nyi.internal (Postfix, from userid 501) id D7CBF160060; Fri, 4 Jun 2021 11:30:31 -0400 (EDT)
X-Mailer: MessagingEngine.com Webmail Interface
User-Agent: Cyrus-JMAP/3.5.0-alpha0-519-g27a961944e-fm-20210531.001-g27a96194
Mime-Version: 1.0
Message-Id: <6f049093-5610-42f7-af33-7ec58c1a5d7b@www.fastmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <HE1PR0702MB3772676E4DE8992AFB2548A4953B9@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
References: <d314198b-6c01-4b15-84d8-9896b5fdee80@www.fastmail.com> <HE1PR0702MB3772355483E2771650C6D679953F9@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com> <CABcZeBOXLy7VA=t7F5UC-DuKE4NPymOvXThaevKkKD3n_G5RaA@mail.gmail.com> <eda844f5db2a5f19e60a67e79e0509498285ba29.camel@ericsson.com> <CAPDSy+7Uoxb+sAxA8shQM2yUgBeMXVanF6YWZdxPM_Jx5PpQGA@mail.gmail.com> <HE1PR0702MB3772676E4DE8992AFB2548A4953B9@HE1PR0702MB3772.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 08:30:08 -0700
From: Christopher Wood <caw@heapingbits.net>
To: Magnus Westerlund <magnus.westerlund@ericsson.com>, David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: "masque@ietf.org" <masque@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/ceWZyll4ymngDTTUby0mK-DiWIc>
Subject: Re: [Masque] WGLC for "Requirements for a MASQUE Protocol to Proxy IP Traffic"
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2021 15:30:40 -0000

On Fri, Jun 4, 2021, at 8:25 AM, Magnus Westerlund wrote:
>
> If it is a minor detail, then lets address that “detail” then and 
> create a WG consensus. 

The purpose of this WGLC is to try and establish such consensus. To that end, it would be useful if folks could chime in on any points of contention, especially this particular section, so we can assess consensus upon completion.

Thanks,
Chris, for the chairs

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email