IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Masque] Splitting MASQUE Obfuscation out of MASQUE

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 17 January 2020 02:46 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C2EE120099 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:46:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qQUfCkKX39PY for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:46:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-lj1-x22a.google.com (mail-lj1-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C45D71200CD for <masque@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:46:24 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-lj1-x22a.google.com with SMTP id w1so24869444ljh.5 for <masque@ietf.org>; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:46:24 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ZWni/T/qQp4Li9lX7mudnSUs2km3suN/Mmy6VNjR5mk=; b=SRMwGhZON27YE/U8k2P8OTc9Vr3Ucea7mF9BbGyPoG4S+7quka2wkbM/iENQ8PI6r9 jpssD857TAIE4bW9LI3GmKkd+T6BAfZY6t24QkCQWYojPqK2As6DFDyWY4FIwLb+pIci wX9lVsp4qrwUFSNxfUDCGgf9jqKKFhKSBMsnM6QRvyVQ9EfuMDQOfARBHbPeXhC+Pmui FDFibEiBjq89sV1EHoeXSzFsMCzNDUSVyoUhYX684Xu3RqegrJWygIX0xzWV2PIsL5LP h+vgf99w1WvR62l9nDn70OKSq5mhr/E33Cj+CXvrAZijdvC9QLhGq688Y9GfRlElRuKk SKIg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ZWni/T/qQp4Li9lX7mudnSUs2km3suN/Mmy6VNjR5mk=; b=K3x1eKcFU4TqyMh4ZAQbWhB8VoJVNiDQxDSO5SKlZLPh+/5RWbSLmxHLgsDMf3oCQY 8cLLziOeTHpmr/Qo+K4vwKsOBH2lN09PiPxCTJSa6Y5KMC6EQZPvloxl1aghaSmet45/ a1cfwY07lwuo0oExQp8YZEsY95Fp4NOcPi2JI/f2pwPYyAFjkhhf4Bz4ervJgySkPYaa TkgMyNZ60Pp/tVsOXKHDFFLuYIUmN/AAGDKdcL5dGgOoGHpdyfXkC7xCYSJEstkYaAKn lYmXQZ5QuZexTYoipDJe0VCVTJVd9EGXhHZ3svp68em1B0OqR81cbGguOlngDKtPvlNS Q06w==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUW6IJdqNw5KQyqvUeWRHGaEZUv2Os9VqOLucKl/OJlqjAS/G/H /Omzy1COCGb+bUt7WgegD7tSNiMLNIacSM9q0Jk=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqzmw34WaYxtsyv0lBAz7Wt72Kgi/Kr7B+38ytbZcarBuiUpg1NJ1W3cUGCTUkuA9OBSc/GIKlCMa+dDHKwvMdU=
X-Received: by 2002:a2e:978d:: with SMTP id y13mr4233822lji.103.1579229183129; Thu, 16 Jan 2020 18:46:23 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAPDSy+7Spz7iOM+s-08jFaqjgFDUJEYqav4whJV+yHNzc32G3w@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAPDSy+7Spz7iOM+s-08jFaqjgFDUJEYqav4whJV+yHNzc32G3w@mail.gmail.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:45:56 +0900
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-cAi-ZnBKrfzDHc6ceLiRAYrOm52f2xOpQ==hw-J9j+DA@mail.gmail.com>
To: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Cc: MASQUE <masque@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000007abebc059c4cf286"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/hVCKxN_pZ73ZvJeNgr-pu_Pzcp4>
Subject: Re: [Masque] Splitting MASQUE Obfuscation out of MASQUE
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 02:46:27 -0000

Hi, David,

I had intended to thank you for this split, and Mirja's thank-you reminded
me that I had not.

I think it's much easier for this work to move forward without fate-sharing.

Best,

Spencer

On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 7:01 AM David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi MASQUE enthusiasts,
>
> One piece of feedback I've gotten about MASQUE was that there is more
> community interest in working on the "how do we make better proxies running
> over QUIC?" question than on the "how can I hide a VPN behind an HTTPS
> server?" question.
>
> Therefore I've split out the hidden VPN use-case into its own draft, named
> MASQUE Obfuscation:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schinazi-masque-obfuscation
>
> The core MASQUE draft is now more focused on laying out a generic
> mechanism for multiplexing applications over QUIC:
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-schinazi-masque
>
> Conceptually, MASQUE Obfuscation is now just a single use-case for MASQUE
> among others.
>
> In terms of next steps, I'll be working on fleshing out the specific
> protocol bits of MASQUE, and on a draft charter to discuss the potential
> creation of a MASQUE working group. More details to follow.
>
> Thanks,
> David
> --
> Masque mailing list
> Masque@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email