Re: [Masque] Warren Kumari's No Objection on draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp-14: (with COMMENT)

[David Schinazi <[e-mail]>]

Hi Warren, thanks for your review.
Since your comment is in support of Rob's comments, let's continue the
discussion on that email thread.
David

On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:36 AM Warren Kumari via Datatracker <
[e-mail]> wrote:

> Warren Kumari has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp-14: No Objection
>
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
>
>
> Please refer to
> https://www.ietf.org/about/groups/iesg/statements/handling-ballot-positions/
> for more information about how to handle DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>
>
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-masque-connect-udp/
>
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Thank you to Al Morton for the useful OpsDir review, and to the authors for
> working with Al to address the comments -- I think that it noticeably
> improved
> the document. I think that the document is both useful and clear -- but,
> while
> copying my ballot comments from my tablet into the tool I read Rob's
> comments,
> and strongly support his "what is this masque thing of which you speak?"
> (well,
> how will anyone understand this is 10 years, and would e.g:
> .well-known/udp-proxy be better?) and also his "a picture is worth a
> thousand
> words comment -- having a simple ASCII art diagram explaining the players
> would
> make this much much simpler for folk like myself to understand this
> mechanism.
>
>
>
>