[Masque] Update to Proxy Requirements
David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 08 January 2021 16:27 UTC
Return-Path: <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: masque@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E84473A1107 for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:27:51 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8r9WamNPxO5Y for <masque@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-pj1-x1031.google.com (mail-pj1-x1031.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::1031]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 482043A10C1 for <masque@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jan 2021 08:27:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-pj1-x1031.google.com with SMTP id m5so6429798pjv.5 for <masque@ietf.org>; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 08:27:50 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=r2hv4RY5j3B+8DlphttZITyQLSXZV8HksodDhcUcD28=; b=lJUb6DujnqWKi6HzCnSY/QeNb5oKDOlb95VXOKruVwyU8bb3KcSUEMeYb2wT5QvAAn YXXFsIZfdIS3HRn7LDXoft8fI4L+SdipbUMVmvNetS8EqFXqRWPI9pUIddL7jr2rPPbC itOoAi2aw0LQjzTjR5G9vJOnsvbHNtke9QhajrHjBgWd3JhyiaJix3JWyQIjo0W3Uxv4 A5D3xlSLH73cMb/ZNC5D7yYNii2Jm7JQAjALsLAYARavG3Jeozu2483b/wGsdUbND9lZ K9ERDdM2RsmLgUPltM/X6zTFpgxZqLUWobmgn++KzdmSbmsWF2Zf0nMqhAavVJIEv5nM AGBA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=r2hv4RY5j3B+8DlphttZITyQLSXZV8HksodDhcUcD28=; b=gvEv7oXgXJsEvRizNkLXjqvZJogWUdGdk8xpeB+4Gl4qsQ4oejjIvZEMh2kib1aPxo r6GN/ZoCLRiu/MqxrKglHlhbwF8poPdPy00JHSxfz4ouLR5dbumMcsSWurzgnCIYt3f1 1p3ynQB0OF55foPIoahbooBwUTnPePzBHPrYvPGMVkXB1PCwgrImOkuafDKIGsG4p0Q+ PnmTqphc67uGhvwJEp3RVZ23Pxd0uPMHv2agvG+FS1yd/2cPF9VNG7N3XW0HjsUSRdCS iFVqdv1gn1Us/qkCH8Y2CCZx/8jIF6InAg+vYl2jy2B6vAExvmBozn+K6lc1BT1kJ+5M Vajw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530Z7M/9iw/dfdvtFA0LnViYMtchtoM7c4CHqJp2fX+qh90tiuFl OKomFO6JynUBjOmsCA+u204YsW0b/R/D0lT2pPJQKcO98m0=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyJA34FJJm9lmROOnUbCFnFS6QaFX4XLs92PVEL4BHv0p7aZj88keKfjNdQxAEhQc9UtZnhV/CLOg6eiA6ZPKg=
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:c584:b029:da:cc62:22f1 with SMTP id p4-20020a170902c584b02900dacc6222f1mr4598289plx.54.1610123269460; Fri, 08 Jan 2021 08:27:49 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: David Schinazi <dschinazi.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 17:27:38 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPDSy+5mcN4Xf-Q9kM1DBhbpxq5G1T2DK7OUcCCp-9+j0r9dXA@mail.gmail.com>
To: MASQUE <masque@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000085558105b866094c"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/masque/zXRna6UHx7opn0VAbkMfhuTJv1Q>
Subject: [Masque] Update to Proxy Requirements
X-BeenThere: masque@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Multiplexed Application Substrate over QUIC Encryption <masque.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/masque/>
List-Post: <mailto:masque@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/masque>, <mailto:masque-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jan 2021 16:27:52 -0000
Hi MASQUE enthusiasts, Alex and I have gone through the feedback we've received during IETF 109, and since then on the list and GitHub. We did our best to address these comments and hopefully clary and improve the document. The main change was a stronger focus on Extensibility, and the removal of some controversial requirements which are now only mentioned as potential future extensions. Please let us know what you think! https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-masque-ip-proxy-reqs-01 Thanks, David
- [Masque] Update to Proxy Requirements David Schinazi