[MBONED] ipv4 multicast address ranges, actual usage.

Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 20:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dave.taht@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A09DA120A77 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id gguBChohK7WI for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-il1-x130.google.com (mail-il1-x130.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::130]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 227BB12081B for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-il1-x130.google.com with SMTP id f5so2794430ilq.5 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:43 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/kmO/xkFVDxYMp4TX7ETZfH+CXm7+d3NGLhKe90I0+c=; b=W4IjkGm7NcqUHGOb2jfmPHNi8ZG3WU9D5h76bJIJ3SnIJQ2XUAsYU7cI3SPaAam6my nGILOgp8DU/tg2u2IyUMxRhQ1V37Lr5sv/vKfHRCPs7A9kmok42A9vok5y9XJ2IL4Czf n0OxYwkfjeYBwTWEnzfnUgXkZ4Cr/gATBHCl6qNMvxTISr3IfpwJpAeGJ6uMe/38KRdp Kf3/lj9FVHTbnpxTe+QPYyTKX1Ze+hA19fGe9vlmWsJBrwjYjhrncGhyoX8FTF2tNwUC qUJLiYrk1gmFFrpB0Bj6g4joEvUHZ+p0R70agiuHlb/WoBy6YOhJsFuaz1tzpigfta1u Ritw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-transfer-encoding; bh=/kmO/xkFVDxYMp4TX7ETZfH+CXm7+d3NGLhKe90I0+c=; b=n5euqNjCBQRiwJ6d6fH8g8nAo0pnL7HbNmIb+8qIlH7tqfPKjW/0uERIbDiOuKIAbJ Ekj9L//xMDJYH2YwjuQ7pp1mmB/n62Cg6sLEOaFMmWH1jYTafj7oEDXY0+PQmbjLYEVo vGUZPCSHJmmaW91LRyuVxLm/PNVbeydeL7J9iNRAOPlqgwc6c+lDo+bsfpHdzXAS6BS/ M5iWzgSlRnEmlHZIImfFERA9T5DQ0EV9jsKwBRrDFKCU0cf/ysjsntgrG8NNYJ5cV1ll Ir1vqIeN6tYW6cfotg7YbsgBQE+atckUNDl9XFfFjloIfDuPl/eU726MjbEh7lpFftcn eW6g==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXzg3URGUU5ufzl7Oz+uDyXq7pp95RtyX9Iuiqolw+XfXPcHDch 7KhPUnA1j/H1eF+Yx6o8sJkifbRAcuDTLOmBvnhDPmBj
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqxdy6SG2xDYqn+BjQ64ZnmwHqAeWPnXLUYgtV45yckeBot62rKrLYlsHcEzP7nie3y+TKYN3PRaodslals/UT0=
X-Received: by 2002:a05:6e02:5c8:: with SMTP id l8mr3715787ils.287.1576699841968; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:41 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Dave Taht <dave.taht@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 12:10:30 -0800
Message-ID: <CAA93jw6Wy=+cc1kHNm97SMjYW31KNhaEM4KXZo=nFcCkG9UjCQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: mboned@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/--ENNBKiUJiw-JAO0457l-X7JII>
Subject: [MBONED] ipv4 multicast address ranges, actual usage.
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 20:10:44 -0000

As a few people know I've been working (quixotically) in my spare time
towards making more of the IPv4 address space generally usable. We've
landed patches for 0/8 in linux, and 240/4 had already been mostly
made working a decade back.

Now we come against a harder problem, in that 1) - a vast swath of
multicast address space was never allocated for anything by iana
(225/8-231/8) and 2) 232/8-238/8 appears severely underutilized. Only
portions of 224/8 and 239/8 seem to have any usage at all.

We've successfully made that first formerly multicast range pretty
generally usable in a string of patches on our github for various oses
and routing daemons. https://github.com/dtaht/unicast-extensions - and
for a drafty draft of a draft internet draft, see:
https://github.com/dtaht/unicast-extensions/blob/master/rfcs/draft-gilmore-taht-v4uniext.txt

My question today, though (lacking finding a mailing list more
suitable than this - is there one?), is to what extent are the various
allocations in the 232/8 to 238/8 range actually used today, and for
what?


-- 
Make Music, Not War

Dave Täht
CTO, TekLibre, LLC
http://www.teklibre.com
Tel: 1-831-435-0729