Re: [MBONED] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-25: (with COMMENT)

Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> Wed, 01 August 2018 03:04 UTC

Return-Path: <asaeda@ieee.org>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E99130F93 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:04:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.01
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.01 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2Gdv1iNJORyH for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:04:47 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pl0-x234.google.com (mail-pl0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c01::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AAA80130E96 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pl0-x234.google.com with SMTP id m16-v6so8054207pls.11 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ieee-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=y9K5lmrGn+QBi2U/BSPV/Id4nfLI8elWAUjyqB5XoZ0=; b=fnNHq8kGMWBtKYX6EG9xq7iizOPQVNIN3pOJvPhoXaCUrUwj8iVDI0BVW5qhDXs46N RwJaAwZaWP4cLHWeWaZ3Fwd5xf2MOp3AsjL+uwNso2a9DHXTwPMAmgu4aWPykNbK0qbV kkXMq4HE4aAseloT3dnVy050b3A+EnEtyOVMSeKLfUujykaAVWrc2nFtDjM3dhdDM1rz 0ibDUpiz62Olu/XOqNMPIAq11ktBth6l+1C95/5TCAg/QzGU67gjOFEjhsRW+kJElifX ZGRivF8NbU7Lehoz7CnnocChf72dz6TUwgfBQtHuyc1tUj33a953jMFIxKqypQfEVrEo Bemw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=y9K5lmrGn+QBi2U/BSPV/Id4nfLI8elWAUjyqB5XoZ0=; b=j2VlAZY2ctUya+sKYMI33BYwXOoWyw1l0B4GkSwvpxqK5ublqzQjgaKt7kPEBteVfC uRM7KNh7Y4TzvBySfhC2ovebWwRlWTrL+Rgv9Y1st/YOA3igHnPKREpL7re4+27BZeOY I3xL4GfsfGoD8dYP3jb/L1fw+s2cYmhEH7tLr3+mYpicd3HaXkqJlnRhS9SIQUd6c6aR fTHSuiaezrEfctDPln40M5edqCDlxf9978nKME2glaWbM7zHACRCyB+jq/7j8X+zJLI4 U2JgS7OkSmNNzSI9E0f5OsL7Vhd64NnIr15xt2AMMaFMkqIkRHNM/qjiVCvAF4tLh98m ZYzw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOUpUlGl4dbD2Zk9huCyUSALjwsv7ohcn58Qm/MP/PPOOJRiyS6e8odL eEZyiHzu6qtBbVlmbE4KxXRseg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AAOMgpc/yj8mfPID1IlBRvUBGHhVcsdd722pK8RHQLsbHqd5kyh41brA9LXcpjcOjRoigofzs27c3Q==
X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:6f02:: with SMTP id w2-v6mr22293406plk.216.1533092684167; Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:04:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2001:200:e103:1000:bdb8:ffc9:4d51:f683? ([2001:200:e103:1000:bdb8:ffc9:4d51:f683]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id p73-v6sm15348394pfk.186.2018.07.31.20.04.41 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 31 Jul 2018 20:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 11.5 \(3445.9.1\))
From: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>
In-Reply-To: <CAHANBtL9EBN=g2Y7m6U8MgH82JayuhqaGsDgtgJcBEnVXaZK3g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 1 Aug 2018 12:04:39 +0900
Cc: Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2@ietf.org, MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>, mboned-chairs@ietf.org, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <191AA31C-F142-47A8-B8EC-2DD221F5EB66@ieee.org>
References: <153260979330.25917.11571674393108777624.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CAHANBtL9EBN=g2Y7m6U8MgH82JayuhqaGsDgtgJcBEnVXaZK3g@mail.gmail.com>
To: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.9.1)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/0RAWxIeCOB3MdayKYVzBGY4TLL8>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Eric Rescorla's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-25: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.27
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Aug 2018 03:04:48 -0000

Hi Stig,

> On 2018/08/01, at 7:38, Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi
> 
> I would like some minor changes to the mtrace draft.
> 
> In 4.1.1 it says:
> 
>   Mtrace2 supports a non-local client to the LHR/RP.  A router SHOULD,
>   however, support a mechanism to filter out queries from clients
>   beyond a specified administrative boundary.  The potential approaches
>   are described in Section 9.2.
> 
> In 9.2 it says:
> 
>   A router providing Mtrace2 functionality MUST support a source
>   verification mechanism to drop Queries from clients and Requests from
>   peer router or client addresses that are unauthorized or that are
>   beyond a specified administrative boundary.  This verification could,
> 
> I think 4.1.1 should be changed to say "drop queries", similar to 9.2.

That's right.
And also above 4.1.1's SHOULD should be MUST.
Thanks for pointing this out.

> Figure 2 is wrong. It shows 17 bits for Query ID and 15 for Client
> Port #. They are however 16 bits each.

Oh, good catch.

Thanks for your careful check. I submit the revised draft ASAP.

Regards.

Hitoshi


> Stig
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 5:56 AM, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com> wrote:
>> Eric Rescorla has entered the following ballot position for
>> draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-25: No Objection
>> 
>> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
>> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
>> introductory paragraph, however.)
>> 
>> 
>> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
>> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
>> 
>> 
>> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2/
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> COMMENT:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> Thank you for addressing my DISCUSS
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MBONED mailing list
>> MBONED@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned