IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] MBONED Digest, Vol 134, Issue 10

"James A. (Jim) Stevens" <james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com> Mon, 02 April 2018 04:31 UTC

Return-Path: <james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 265EC126579 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 21:31:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.91
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.91 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Y6A-2CvU6DQm for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 21:31:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ch3vs04.rockwellcollins.com (ch3vs04.rockwellcollins.com [205.175.226.52]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5190B124B17 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 21:31:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-RC-All-From: , 205.175.226.20, No hostname, james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com, "James A. (Jim) Stevens" <james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com>, ,
X-RC-Attachments: , ,
X-RC-RemoteIP: 205.175.226.20
X-RC-RemoteHost: No hostname
X-RC-IP-Hostname: ch3ip04.rockwellcollins.com
X-RC-IP-MID: 4910994
X-RC-IP-Group: GOOGLE_RELAYED
X-RC-IP-Policy: $GOOGLE_RELAYED
X-RC-IP-SBRS: None
Received: from unknown (HELO mail-wr0-f198.google.com) ([205.175.226.20]) by ch3vs04.rockwellcollins.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-GCM-SHA256; 01 Apr 2018 23:31:14 -0500
Received: by mail-wr0-f198.google.com with SMTP id b17so7064179wrf.20 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:31:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=dVmAe6ttnLxEG5IedhAi3XiQHQpKnv+iJp2Yo/KiGrI=; b=W6BLrzCPBCW0/Ztwc1LTTjZ7dXSW95EOUtQ6vspblZzZg6sxQoGZFuO4TBfTEza8nS 4dn2+7haGhQHpXML+HqJaiB+WSV4WwEhvS4mRNR0btZHY/ObDKwrlrKMpZUu8BZZkdOx kIXU3Ceu/7zJZ6ER048SbwGjTnBMhg2xmtrroq2kVn0r0Nit1czTWiWTazco2rkNOUQF jMOVhHqPd7d9Aqn1bFJ8haITdNqwoSjdh+gmZsvD9wAy8+MX1VIh3sU6TSEPuQlvIHcx 7M4DbFeXLYYx/1FqGTfD83X1IfUz0xn1BCLLRQqvWINoMnuPFwK3Fd+JfwnQpXviK/zN cLzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7ED4ZNxOuAvpm2Q2y3dYrZwKP+sELIJvxY5GSgiRvW1peHM9fQe HRlGzrZJ3SOXIvPPSVaAQSOXLh0/V9gBwY8xOzch7R8SsufYH/VfdMHgv8TdTpnlFXZPKJ6O6wr o+bZEyKXjCse2HyvW1mW9gUpeyEZ67UCIrs0UDXrOyQ==
X-Received: by 10.223.136.13 with SMTP id d13mr5226363wrd.271.1522643472836; Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4/lRYR6AqLjZm6xZk+p+2qdird/Tl/B66mxQEZVDkZkyt0xAs2wehrVshoWo0Sm2nuo+J2U/UD5V0JNEHBBvD8=
X-Received: by 10.223.136.13 with SMTP id d13mr5226351wrd.271.1522643472540; Sun, 01 Apr 2018 21:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.28.20.15 with HTTP; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 21:31:12 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20180401130343.GA28411@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
References: <mailman.5.1522436416.18425.mboned@ietf.org> <CAH8Jh6Ba7Qo7Em1Y9O-jpyNpEfnbCQ6u_OwC0zXemSTPpEtkCA@mail.gmail.com> <20180401130343.GA28411@faui40p.informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
From: "James A. (Jim) Stevens" <james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 23:31:12 -0500
Message-ID: <CAH8Jh6BOT8cmirE1eWt5U-YxV9i7-sMAyD5FgGzMt7eOJpOj_Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de>
Cc: mboned@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1146107c4cfcdb0568d60f8d"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/1EEEqKlqg7F0MArlFfnqF2Pk8qo>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] MBONED Digest, Vol 134, Issue 10
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2018 04:31:18 -0000

Toerless, we are using Bidir-PIM.

I haven't been tracking
​
RFC 8364, but from just glancing at it, I think Bidir-PIM is probably
better for these bursty source/destination multicast applications as well
as being an existing standard available in some routers and host operating
systems. Doesn't mean I couldn't change my opinion as I learn more and it
becomes widely available, however.

Cheers,
Jim

On Sun, Apr 1, 2018 at 8:03 AM, Toerless Eckert <tte@cs.fau.de> wrote:

> Thanks, James, Tim
>
> Agreed. That additional text in the abstract didn't add good value *sigh*
>
> Can i ask whether you are using PIM-SM or Bidir-PIM for these type of apps
> ?
> Always particularily curious about how well PIM-SM with bursty sources
> does work well (or not) in different scenarios. E.g: Do you think that
> ​​
> RFC 8364 would work equally well for your app environment ?
>
> Cheers
>     Toerless
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email