Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-03.txt
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com> Tue, 14 August 2012 07:07 UTC
Return-Path: <mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 77D0111E80D2 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.015
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.015 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.233, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY=0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id L-V58uhcq7bV for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:07:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relais-inet.francetelecom.com (relais-ias91.francetelecom.com [193.251.215.91]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FDD011E80AE for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 00:07:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (unknown [xx.xx.xx.2]) by omfedm13.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 5FA9A32435A; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:07:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr (unknown [10.101.44.32]) by omfedm06.si.francetelecom.fr (ESMTP service) with ESMTP id 4533027C053; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:07:32 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.9]) by PUEXCH61.nanterre.francetelecom.fr ([10.101.44.32]) with mapi; Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:07:15 +0200
From: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
To: "sarikaya@ieee.org" <sarikaya@ieee.org>, MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 09:07:14 +0200
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-03.txt
Thread-Index: Ac15kTJXedRjCPn7Q6Ozz+FNISPTXgAV6KIA
Message-ID: <94C682931C08B048B7A8645303FDC9F36E4FC2D858@PUEXCB1B.nanterre.francetelecom.fr>
References: <CAC8QAcdJ-u_XrWQ=soNL9rMykMD4W4oxsZrGDBdFcMU8t2ebqg@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAC8QAcdJ-u_XrWQ=soNL9rMykMD4W4oxsZrGDBdFcMU8t2ebqg@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR
Content-Language: fr-FR
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: fr-FR
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-PMX-Version: 5.6.1.2065439, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.376379, Antispam-Data: 2012.8.14.60320
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-03.txt
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Aug 2012 07:07:35 -0000
Hi Behcet, all, I was planning to send an e-mail to the list to notify the main changes we implemented in -03. Since you started this thread, I will use it for that purpose. The main changes are as follows: * Abandon the M-bit idea * Reserve two prefixes to be used for the algorithmic translation of an IPv6 multicast address into an IPv4 one; and vice versa (1) ff3x:0:8000::/96 for SSM (2) ffxx:8000::/20 for ASM * Explain the rationale for selecting a /96 (SSM) and /20 (ASM) * The document does not update RFC4291; i.e., no change to the IPv6 addressing architecture. Cheers, Med >-----Message d'origine----- >De : mboned-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces@ietf.org] >De la part de Behcet Sarikaya >Envoyé : lundi 13 août 2012 22:21 >À : MBONED WG >Objet : [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-03.txt > >Hi authors, > >Thanks for the revised draft, I find that the revision is in the right >direction. > >I am confused on the prefix lengths: >on Figure 2, >ffxx:8000:0:abc::/96 >while in Section 3.1 >ffxx:8000::/20 > >How come these are reserved prefixes? >What are the values that are reserved? > >If you look at RFC 6052, the unicast translation specification, >64:ff9b::/96 is defined as the Well-Known Prefix. There are no x's in >the prefix definition. > >Regards, > >Behcet > >On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 1:49 AM, <internet-drafts@ietf.org> wrote: >> >> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line >Internet-Drafts directories. >> This draft is a work item of the MBONE Deployment Working >Group of the IETF. >> >> Title : IPv6 Multicast Address With >Embedded IPv4 Multicast Address >> Author(s) : Mohamed Boucadair >> Jacni Qin >> Yiu L. Lee >> Stig Venaas >> Xing Li >> Mingwei Xu >> Filename : >draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-03.txt >> Pages : 13 >> Date : 2012-08-09 >> >> Abstract: >> This document reserves two IPv6 multicast prefixes to be >used in the >> context of IPv4-IPv6 interconnection. The document specifies an >> algorithmic translation of an IPv6 multicast address to a >> corresponding IPv4 multicast address, and vice versa. This >> algorithmic translation can be used in both IPv4-IPv6 >translation or >> encapsulation schemes. >> >> >> >> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: >> >https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast >-address-format >> >> There's also a htmlized version available at: >> >http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre ss-format-03 >> >> A diff from the previous version is available at: >> >http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast >-address-format-03 >> >> >> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: >> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> MBONED mailing list >> MBONED@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned >_______________________________________________ >MBONED mailing list >MBONED@ietf.org >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned >
- [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-f… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Brian Haberman
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Stig Venaas
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Brian Haberman
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Stig Venaas
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Stig Venaas
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Lee, Yiu
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Tim Chown
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Stig Venaas
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Stig Venaas
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… mohamed.boucadair
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Jacni Qin
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Tim Chown
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Jacni Qin
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Behcet Sarikaya
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Tim Chown
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… Jacni Qin
- Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-addre… mohamed.boucadair