Re: [MBONED] MBONED Digest, Vol 134, Issue 10

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Sun, 01 April 2018 10:05 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DD22124217 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 03:05:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.301
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WsSmGiqLPLPD for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 03:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [146.101.78.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9566D120727 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 03:05:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1522577120; h=from:subject:date:message-id:to:cc:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:references; bh=70aXebh5t4nopQ3N3VWkBe4tMM86/2nogdqxXCFr1PQ=; b=QFsSIpL6e5JONGOK3+lip7ewrgXG0a+EGaV8q9aO1HqsadFUjPhUlFVLOtvXzP2UD0IYtiWDK6E9ghLPzIvtseu9pV0Mitg3eUem02wyrsS2PjYG8ffYUamdegjIUkUOQQ0WEXN4GNsnpsfg0biS2YQeRaj7OYu64utSzohKVbk=
Received: from EUR01-VE1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-ve1eur01lp0247.outbound.protection.outlook.com [213.199.154.247]) (Using TLS) by eu-smtp-1.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-131-QwNtSRiFOteE7e_dw9baFA-1; Sun, 01 Apr 2018 11:05:18 +0100
Received: from VI1PR07MB0879.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.161.108.21) by VI1PR07MB1677.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.166.143.9) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.653.4; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 10:05:14 +0000
Received: from VI1PR07MB0879.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4011:38b1:3ecf:4201]) by VI1PR07MB0879.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::4011:38b1:3ecf:4201%6]) with mapi id 15.20.0653.005; Sun, 1 Apr 2018 10:05:14 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: "James A. (Jim) Stevens" <james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com>
CC: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] MBONED Digest, Vol 134, Issue 10
Thread-Index: AQHTyJ8bhQiy/ORy6kuQwA26EJMFZ6PrsJmA
Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 10:05:14 +0000
Message-ID: <AC7167E2-41FF-41C4-9DCF-104824A2217F@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <mailman.5.1522436416.18425.mboned@ietf.org> <CAH8Jh6Ba7Qo7Em1Y9O-jpyNpEfnbCQ6u_OwC0zXemSTPpEtkCA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAH8Jh6Ba7Qo7Em1Y9O-jpyNpEfnbCQ6u_OwC0zXemSTPpEtkCA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3445.5.20)
x-originating-ip: [2001:a88:d510:1101:6c96:d1ee:a35c:6f32]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-microsoft-exchange-diagnostics: 1; VI1PR07MB1677; 7:++moulgi2BHQlyFqE7lfL/OtvA4xOxpbn8bhFfpH53LR4i5xyKB8T11tYB2q6cp3SNbNetGztyzhsyrWkIu42hHbA7nJOwF+i/Ko6j1ikFQuEFPUP3t3BqhavC4yNdGf3wYN41d86aBza4CrIhM1GGtB9iHx0AcE5p/quequkVqFe6TR8EsR7rEHNoJ4IYcMseoLrtARQ+Lokt0l8TdYpt5nNLqkPtgOtxL5eneZZ/TDWQ9Isl1qcoiWKw3WfFH8; 20:L+nvHh4y7OST7+lTmOXliXvKT+jPYV+jp+iPbKqnzTVSr3ZgFZGun/FN1lJhqBnlLrc9Oh6LKjRDrCWkZ5o3vEdXTxpAiRmiwDuar765ONB3eEikkDv9ggTrfLuwfT3MUYXRNzkyoPlPCIdDdelDPhkvjW/DgSyv1DWICcH9cy0=
x-ms-exchange-antispam-srfa-diagnostics: SOS;
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: 3eff8802-83a3-4cc5-b487-08d597b81035
x-microsoft-antispam: UriScan:; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(7020095)(4652020)(5600026)(4604075)(3008032)(4534165)(4627221)(201703031133081)(201702281549075)(2017052603328)(7153060)(7193020); SRVR:VI1PR07MB1677;
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: VI1PR07MB1677:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <VI1PR07MB1677B5F578FF2C722CA9DDD9D6A70@VI1PR07MB1677.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-exchange-antispam-report-test: UriScan:(274715658323672)(278428928389397);
x-exchange-antispam-report-cfa-test: BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:(6040522)(2401047)(5005006)(8121501046)(10201501046)(93006095)(93001095)(3002001)(3231221)(944501327)(52105095)(6041310)(201703131423095)(201702281529075)(201702281528075)(20161123555045)(201703061421075)(201703061406153)(20161123560045)(20161123564045)(20161123558120)(20161123562045)(6072148)(201708071742011); SRVR:VI1PR07MB1677; BCL:0; PCL:0; RULEID:; SRVR:VI1PR07MB1677;
x-forefront-prvs: 06290ECA9D
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(376002)(346002)(39380400002)(39850400004)(366004)(396003)(189003)(5403001)(199004)(18543002)(10533003)(377424004)(51444003)(76176011)(316002)(3280700002)(7736002)(4326008)(229853002)(6916009)(14454004)(786003)(6436002)(3660700001)(6486002)(6246003)(97736004)(6512007)(33656002)(6116002)(59450400001)(53936002)(53546011)(8936002)(6506007)(68736007)(305945005)(74482002)(102836004)(105586002)(72206003)(11346002)(57306001)(446003)(106356001)(8676002)(2616005)(81166006)(81156014)(99286004)(476003)(486005)(486005)(36756003)(50226002)(186003)(46003)(2906002)(5660300001)(2900100001)(86362001)(82746002)(25786009)(83716003)(5250100002)(478600001); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:VI1PR07MB1677; H:VI1PR07MB0879.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; MX:1; A:1;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: E4eqDHh90EkN60CW7TDJVB9jp0Jk17MIv4rnIBnbtlCr5gIJKaz0LwJkyAG6N4TGo5iZRUdBauZjVnoNQ5kUSTmkMGuWR4SRNvo4q90X3wWFPAGEuDbzuRH7OqtASOgm77O2cqjmr8jKf2EDj987ApAtg1KLB2UnSQVT8S6Ho1OqrOPF7mGDrHmnb8x/oNoSBRmpsjGSd4/l6WmMIoIJ9oWoYE1EEy1SWz9Zr0nhjslRFkerfsWGbiuMtLtGTyDGcDnZbFskrQCY5LO7DT8jN5tl4mL4oKSKifndsxkWsnw4F7zKhfx5mo8H4HpHrP9/qfXVgdeOd3EkdSepf5gUINV+7y1BcpvcNcScwfVKf2Pk4t5Ykyu2fD8G/Jje4wM62bibYiw42pgkq75kRPZGAfHGfI81FkcDSvz1CHqBjYk=
spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
Content-ID: <AA11E7F3116AC243BF2C6E7342695EE8@eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: 3eff8802-83a3-4cc5-b487-08d597b81035
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 01 Apr 2018 10:05:14.3434 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: VI1PR07MB1677
X-MC-Unique: QwNtSRiFOteE7e_dw9baFA-1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/9Qk0ff8CGKr-abuBWtnnpkpmLHM>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] MBONED Digest, Vol 134, Issue 10
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Apr 2018 10:05:25 -0000

Hi Jim,

> On 31 Mar 2018, at 04:19, James A. (Jim) Stevens <james.a.stevens@rockwellcollins.com> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, 29 Mar 2018 21:21:34 +0000​ , Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>  wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> We've just posted a new -01 version of the draft on deprecating interdomain ASM. Toerless is now also an author.
> 
> We'll be working on a further new version in the coming weeks, so all comments and suggestions for improvement are very welcome.
> 
> The WG session agreed WG adoption, but I've posted the -01 as an individual draft as the adoption hasn't - I think - been confirmed on the list.
> 
> Best wishes,
> Tim
> 
> > On 29 Mar 2018, at 22:17, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
> >
> >
> > A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
> >
> >
> >        Title           : Deprecating ASM for Interdomain Multicast
> >        Authors         : Mikael Abrahamsson
> >                          Tim Chown
> >                          Lenny Giuliano
> >                          Toerless Eckert
> >       Filename        : draft-acg-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-01.txt
> >       Pages           : 15
> >       Date            : 2018-03-29
> >
> > Abstract:
> >   This document recommends deprecation of the use of Any-Source
> >   Multicast (ASM) for interdomain multicast.  It recommends the use of
> >   Source-Specific Multicast (SSM) for interdomain multicast
> >   applications, and that hosts and routers that are expected to handle
> >   such applications fully support SSM.  The recommendations in this
> >   document do not preclude the continued use of ASM within a single
> >   organisation or domain, and are especially easy to adopt when already
> >   using the preferred ASM protocol options there (PIM-SM).
> 
>  
> ​I think that this is an appropriate document.  One picky comment with respect to the following paragraph from the introduction:
> "   This document does not make any statement on the use of ASM within a
>    single domain or organisation, and therefore does not preclude its
>    use.  Indeed, there may be a number of application contexts for which
>    ASM is currently still considered well-suited within a single domain.
> 
> "​
> ​As per the earlier emails, there are some applications contexts for which ASM is still the best suited approach.​ For example, in an earlier email, I mentioned a multicast scenario with many dynamic bidirectional sources and receivers, where we use ASM rather than SSM model to reduce management overhead and simplify source discovery by not having to track which nodes have joined which groups in order to do an SSM join to all the members of the group. 
> 
> Thus, I recommend rewording the last sentence in that paragraph to something like 
> "    Indeed, there are application contexts for which
>    ASM is still considered well-suited within a single domain."

Perhaps "Indeed, there are application contexts for which ASM is currently still widely considered well-suited within a single domain."

Tim