[MBONED] Suresh Krishnan's Discuss on draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

[Suresh Krishnan via Datatracker <[e-mail]>]

Suresh Krishnan has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-10: Discuss

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
DISCUSS:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I think this should be easy to clear up but I think the following text is vague
and needs be clarified

"  Among relay addresses that have an equivalent preference as described
   above, a Happy Eyeballs algorithm for AMT MUST use the Destination
   Address Selection defined in Section 6 of [RFC6724], as required by
   [RFC8305]."

Does this mean that the addresses are sorted as defined in Section 6 of
[RFC6724] or as defined in Section 4 of [RFC8305] that defines further steps on
top of RC6724 including ordering by RTTs, address family interleaving etc. I
think this needs to be stated explicitly.


----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I had the same question as Barry regarding the "non-deterministic choice"
wording in the draft. I think it would be good if you can be more specific here.