IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-10: (with COMMENT)

"Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com> Wed, 18 December 2019 22:47 UTC

Return-Path: <jholland@akamai.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 254A0120013; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:47:42 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.701
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.701 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.001, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=akamai.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8hWiJctu4w6p; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:47:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00190b01.pphosted.com [IPv6:2620:100:9005:57f::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 562C412008D; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:47:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0050096.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id xBIMe1d9011259; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:47:38 GMT
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=akamai.com; h=from : to : cc : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : content-id : content-transfer-encoding : mime-version; s=jan2016.eng; bh=PQfxtQ0xKPymGCNSrxRKOI1yVdPPkIgLoDPkn1OHHCo=; b=hmpjyyzADNSTbt4ocvdErn1Su2CdIRjAAJXILKXf7PXO9ANZS/Nfc0Hpto01j9Hb9Gha ESlifzfWYeyS62FcFnNWcn//xvr7t53SqLdTWnD+EF3cEy66gSwsDWntxc+eu+L9GPbF 9xlZRYKq1UhE8YE6K1IxaghuzcUSz+FseB6696YTNjCC32iglZHZy3OpRlnU1Jo0RcDO q5i0VcMGAvsSzDk4lmd/UK6lxMUi+IyBlFrWlHmB+62HQjQxCTPSG+icoJwh5jXVNj5N 9Rwwn+BApYC7d5LtCASsdrnEQVX9xTJIpX/IB3Czrt1aenM2LS4HKH/gmuggnr/4oILc eg==
Received: from prod-mail-ppoint8 (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [96.6.114.122] (may be forged)) by m0050096.ppops.net-00190b01. with ESMTP id 2wvs1dak56-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:47:38 +0000
Received: from pps.filterd (prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com [127.0.0.1]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id xBIMHXfK026004; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:47:37 -0500
Received: from email.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.118]) by prod-mail-ppoint8.akamai.com with ESMTP id 2wvuy2avm1-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 18 Dec 2019 17:47:33 -0500
Received: from ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.124) by ustx2ex-dag1mb5.msg.corp.akamai.com (172.27.165.123) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1473.3; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 16:47:22 -0600
Received: from ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.124]) by ustx2ex-dag1mb6.msg.corp.akamai.com ([172.27.165.124]) with mapi id 15.00.1473.005; Wed, 18 Dec 2019 14:47:22 -0800
From: "Holland, Jake" <jholland@akamai.com>
To: "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery@ietf.org>, "mboned-chairs@ietf.org" <mboned-chairs@ietf.org>, "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-10: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVtRTSSAQJ9cKQpEyAczn/EUfrAae+8n2AgAEGg4CAAIcNgA==
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:47:22 +0000
Message-ID: <0356960F-54D7-4264-B70F-FAE8F88F30C4@akamai.com>
References: <157661285538.26445.14640422767755463731.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <1BA9032C-767B-4280-A1EC-0CE76CAAC412@akamai.com> <5C4F5402-7F1B-41DC-AA58-953E505379E1@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <5C4F5402-7F1B-41DC-AA58-953E505379E1@cisco.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/10.20.0.191208
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [172.19.80.250]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-ID: <B7F505C69DF6B04398967F0BD419C248@akamai.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-12-18_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1911140001 definitions=main-1912180169
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.95,18.0.572 definitions=2019-12-18_07:2019-12-17,2019-12-18 signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 mlxscore=0 bulkscore=0 clxscore=1015 adultscore=0 spamscore=0 phishscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 mlxlogscore=999 suspectscore=0 impostorscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-1910280000 definitions=main-1912180170
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/DiJhAEUgU0Ti7sIjDmbWKwRWVXw>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Éric Vyncke's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-driad-amt-discovery-10: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 22:47:42 -0000

On 2019-12-17, 22:44, "Eric Vyncke (evyncke)" <evyncke@cisco.com> wrote:
    FWIW, I'm slightly negative on adding this. I think this is one of
    several details about Happy Eyeballs algorithms that are mostly not
    explicitly spelled out in this doc, but rather implied by reference
    to RFC 8305.

EV> I see what you mean...
   
    However, if you think this is a particularly useful detail to highlight,
    I'm willing to add the above text or similar.
 
EV> this is really the only place where I see it beneficial for the reader to understand. So, up to you, but I am still in favor of the NEW text

[JH] OK, the new text is fine with me.

    NEW:
       This document updates RFC 7450 (Automatic Multicast Tunneling, or
       AMT) by modifying the relay discovery process.  A new DNS resource
       record named AMTRELAY is defined for publishing AMT relays for
       source-specific multicast channels.  The reverse IP DNS zone for a
       multicast sender's IP address is configured to use AMTRELAY resource
       records to advertise a set of AMT relays that can receive and forward
       multicast traffic from that sender over an AMT tunnel.  Other minor
       extensions and clarifications to the relay discovery process are also
       defined.

EV> a step forward in the right direction, any chance to remove the word 'minor' ?
    
[JH] No problem, I'll do it that way.

    
    > == NITS ==
    > 
    > -- Section 2.1 --
    > s/The sender/The multicast source/ ?
    
    I think this would make it slightly less correct.  I think "the multicast
    source" refers to a device sending multicast traffic (or sometimes maybe its
    IP address).  "The sender" at the beginning of paragraph 2 refers to an
    entity that both controls the RR in the DNS zone and also operates a device
    producing multicast traffic.

EV> OK
    
    > -- Section 4.2.2 --
    > Please use the canonical format for IPv6 address. I know this is cosmetic but
    > it hurts my eyes ;-)
    
    I think you meant 4.3.2, and this is just DB8 -> db8, correct?  Or was there
    more?

EV> yes, only one occurrence  AFAIK

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email