Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23.txt

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Tue, 03 April 2018 17:59 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5C0D1243F6 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:59:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mSiy1wrwsm6O for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wr0-x22a.google.com (mail-wr0-x22a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::22a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61C2312EA8D for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wr0-x22a.google.com with SMTP id d1so19542099wrj.13 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:58:56 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=ta3Yj7bPTMaRTNrdUlQHZxIf6+Lr4n+NFnNyeCG1rO8=; b=QFvOztF56Jyu58DJ9OMO3Fds0sKXLHnY46XATM3A7jjfpJS1XVUt7rW3IZEgLvQIbH mULVw6aSI0BDMqFV9nX/MxiZBqhZ1euC7PYbX+3hbWZyqEJBhT12gxyMk6ahI4RZjTxR Cm2DBVsLr+XMCzRYFKzoI+mkSpOEkGvcZ/DmkCVuAZQA00HrPUIKld043GEyVsm1CdNe 2h3tsTM5N4NH5MUORMBVclaYTeXYlIFkad6ia70a6HM9za0mcf0YdIHd77eKZ2djRAgB rqGV5LsL51LGYQ6n4XUtt8VmPvyv6u7Y1pM9S2DuQMTrEwAvd+fE6lslKSMThC1F4Ohn 4G4g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=ta3Yj7bPTMaRTNrdUlQHZxIf6+Lr4n+NFnNyeCG1rO8=; b=RCqwGCwUqf5uqGhAbION7lY5xq9cc9D7MZyqxtJ2TpQuL3hksNJyhxTfqvChQYIVrW /9TOpOLUYibI1i+VM1H3meNpJJp/XML72pNgCYquGjIx+gNqbZkpmKG21q2n2OY4K2M/ FpAq8W1qJDJlMTOFYFVgI8z3aptxU1DSmOhKAsIZK+E4jwWPoHqV1M0wmVrhBopVAS+O rWKpQiNhx3d89eU8CLb1J8pHzUh9UZosbJv3eMenmOuTk9DQg2QQSpfxocwfsxOJX5bs /FzalByDXziolJI2Dyzo1iQkkdpzE8XlagiGzL4/IfzQw12d5y9DH3WU07saHdJ0cPdF EWzQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AElRT7G2NX77nSmHC3uWekMacBtxSpngviNqIgKrd9nn8f/bDB9M06MJ QnHjbHix2Bq2TA43XK+iIbIPGpDJVEO5t0O8N2ETEQ==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+WxGaVr+1om6oV6V2/mWLjvc7XyR2yuDyy28a8jbSGgjPi28GiuT2r3V8ro/kAqiqh35mDPixUrJHzmX32Tr0=
X-Received: by 10.223.131.229 with SMTP id 92mr11170567wre.249.1522778334009; Tue, 03 Apr 2018 10:58:54 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.226.76 with HTTP; Tue, 3 Apr 2018 10:58:13 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <ABFC390D-60B5-4174-A1E6-ECB080C35EE6@ieee.org>
References: <152273560463.13938.7697606193991737143@ietfa.amsl.com> <ABFC390D-60B5-4174-A1E6-ECB080C35EE6@ieee.org>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 13:58:13 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJwkbAw2u3SYwb9EDq-iVovHn=E55HimHWLr_u2MFkmyQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/JE63n9o7Fj1nCufMSfUMrUQOsHA>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23.txt
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2018 17:59:04 -0000

[ +EKR, Mirja ]

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org> wrote:
> Hi WG and Warren,
>
> We've submitted our revised document for Mtrace version 2.
>
> We believe we had addressed all comments and concerns given during the last IESG review.
> Please kindly check the document and restart the IESG review again if you think it satisfies all.

Dear EKR and Mirja,

I think that this version addresses your DISCUSS points.

As it's been a while (2 1/2 months) I've included some links to try
and make this is bit easier:

Your initial reviews:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2/ballot/
Ballots: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-22&url2=draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23

I've also tried to summarize your DISCUSS points and the fixes here:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NZJkqvg504syBUNkhnB9wod20ajoEJhFIusmUbJ0P20/edit?usp=sharing

EKR: I'm not sure if you feel that the Security Considerations section
is now adequate.
Mirja: The document doesn't explicitly instruct IANA to update the
ports registry, but there is a reference to this draft already
(https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?&page=129)
and so I beleive it will be done?

If these address your DISCUSS points, would you be willing to clear?

W

>
> Best regards,
>
> Hitoshi Asaeda
>
>
>> 2018/04/03 15:06, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>
>>
>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>> This draft is a work item of the MBONE Deployment WG of the IETF.
>>
>>        Title           : Mtrace Version 2: Traceroute Facility for IP Multicast
>>        Authors         : Hitoshi Asaeda
>>                          Kerry Meyer
>>                          WeeSan Lee
>>       Filename        : draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23.txt
>>       Pages           : 38
>>       Date            : 2018-04-02
>>
>> Abstract:
>>   This document describes the IP multicast traceroute facility, named
>>   Mtrace version 2 (Mtrace2).  Unlike unicast traceroute, Mtrace2
>>   requires special implementations on the part of routers.  This
>>   specification describes the required functionality in multicast
>>   routers, as well as how an Mtrace2 client invokes a query and
>>   receives a reply.
>>
>>
>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2/
>>
>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23
>>
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23
>>
>>
>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>
>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> MBONED mailing list
>> MBONED@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf