Re: [MBONED] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-05
"Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com> Fri, 03 January 2020 19:48 UTC
Return-Path: <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8236A12009C;
Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1,
DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001,
SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key)
header.d=boeing.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id w7dwIqQ2laqM; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net
[130.76.144.162])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 023BF120013;
Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/DOWNSTREAM_MBSOUT) with SMTP id
003JmnjE007178; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 14:48:51 -0500
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=boeing.com;
s=boeing-s1912; t=1578080931;
bh=OgeFGWJkck9K5FDq4IjWD2dEE6qOx/VwjFcihyKjkas=;
h=From:To:CC:Subject:Date:References:In-Reply-To:From;
b=m5gMRwZGOrb4upxvWo/0Z4NIHOzsSrIuKfcLaXDW1t+9i5iEG4+n+0B3sN19h5D/W
koj3aiwJWbs8bjU+cOo/YL57AbU1POtyJty3qFssb56Q/mhg/OEX4jg6vxF51udMOH
auFwu+NC9fvpBQiQmKmHdWvvADzWBXnEx1fxNTC82s+R8ggqLDr4d6U+TiuEEFYaS0
uQ05Lq2C+nLoHoRgNfgv3S2mncKpKcFjCSO4lGIGIwj5XWug5cmrwMZ4hP3GaFdy1Y
15ZkqMGTkJFTspzrKk6mqIcDuAPVfz8fpgMtnUpqW9OSUK5VbGkscnNAU0faCFURhu
YFDlnnn0LZOJg==
Received: from XCH16-01-07.nos.boeing.com (xch16-01-07.nos.boeing.com
[144.115.65.217])
by clt-mbsout-01.mbs.boeing.net (8.15.2/8.15.2/UPSTREAM_MBSOUT) with ESMTPS id
003Jmbd8005891
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL);
Fri, 3 Jan 2020 14:48:37 -0500
Received: from XCH16-01-11.nos.boeing.com (144.115.66.39) by
XCH16-01-07.nos.boeing.com (144.115.65.217) with Microsoft SMTP Server
(version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_CBC_SHA384) id
15.1.1779.2; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:36 -0800
Received: from XCH16-01-11.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::a96c:5d85:1337:4323]) by
XCH16-01-11.nos.boeing.com ([fe80::a96c:5d85:1337:4323%4]) with mapi id
15.01.1779.002; Fri, 3 Jan 2020 11:48:36 -0800
From: "Manfredi (US), Albert E" <albert.e.manfredi@boeing.com>
To: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
CC: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>, "last-call@ietf.org"
<last-call@ietf.org>,
"draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm.all@ietf.org"
<draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm.all@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [MBONED] Genart last call review of
draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-05
Thread-Index: AQHVvUEaFrEBlC0oakWj2IBPdeEWhafRkQwAgAebZwCAADQ94A==
Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2020 19:48:36 +0000
Message-ID: <9e0d03453f6c45ac854af4e793a848ce@boeing.com>
References: <CAH8Jh6CTyfHz050+WCb=S6cfp=UfUQ9Z0sMAcYZnJWZSoGthzQ@mail.gmail.com>
<1880af9b76e44208aa50459ba4a3cc30@boeing.com>
<AFF7AF2A-4A97-486A-A182-1E5D1F8D583B@jisc.ac.uk>
In-Reply-To: <AFF7AF2A-4A97-486A-A182-1E5D1F8D583B@jisc.ac.uk>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [144.115.204.6]
x-tm-snts-smtp: 8C4E0AA0D288786F478B6E19C3DF93263F89939CA0CBA91BCBA8065AB994819B2000:8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/QxhgPQD1OS-6m_2rq8IB2fjERUw>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Genart last call review of
draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-05
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>,
<mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>,
<mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Jan 2020 19:48:59 -0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> "https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-05#section-4.5. Preferring SSM applications intradomain If feasible, it is recommended for applications to use SSM even if they are initially only meant to be used in intradomain environments supporting ASM. Because PIM-SSM is a subset of PIM-SM, existing intradomain PIM-SM networks are automatically compatible with SSM applications. Thus, SSM applications can operate alongside existing ASM applications. SSM's benefits of simplified address management and significantly reduced operational complexity apply equally to intradomain use. However, for some applications it may be prohibitively difficult to add support for source discovery, so intradomain ASM may still be appropriate." > This wording was the result of comments received from those using ASM within their own networks. Indeed. Just to be clear about why some of us might be sensitive to the wording. RFCs get in the hands of many people involved with network development, including those in a purely management role. So, even if, in principle, intradomain, network designers can twist and stretch RFCs to suit their needs, as long as they break nothing, in practice, network designers are not always able to benefit from this unwritten rule. "It says right here that SSM is preferred," the manager will complain, not necessarily getting all the fallout. Happy New Year mboned! Bert
- [MBONED] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-mb… Dale Worley via Datatracker
- Re: [MBONED] Genart last call review of draft-iet… Tim Chown
- Re: [MBONED] Genart last call review of draft-iet… James A. (Jim) Stevens
- Re: [MBONED] Genart last call review of draft-iet… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: [MBONED] Genart last call review of draft-iet… Tim Chown
- Re: [MBONED] Genart last call review of draft-iet… Manfredi (US), Albert E
- Re: [MBONED] [Gen-art] Genart last call review of… Alissa Cooper