Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23.txt

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 09 April 2018 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD33129C59 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:03:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.711
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.711 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_DKIMWL_WL_MED=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jwDjSgD4IOQB for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:03:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm0-x231.google.com (mail-wm0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c09::231]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C3BEB12D778 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm0-x231.google.com with SMTP id r191so21192786wmg.4 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:03:49 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gaQ5N6jJcyVvT/K6PRB+jDJV+abZGfoHO9QF2R9zJ9I=; b=yfJNhIwfVWetELPYKDjaQj7L1zL0ehYv2WU+ZEfVHxkL15bIwjFbGOQb7cEo0hXNdQ biMaiN1gztywAhbL2UMZ/mtqWTE8mK72PD4ObQyiEbTDlBKsFnz5CX9wq+T67CWkl57P QHvaKG1Me4VWkPSEabLKTzj6b0TSx1CYK7kQ7wl9oylsjoKbPWRAq+U6Lypu74+wmmWH VRrz7trU4lq5zBl+aW3i+vNdF85+E8fkR9Od+ZNEH+oI05bAX763hcoBFobtd0YaAj6Y +NdMsIj8TO1nESn8sxiSGzPfSIX+C+J4cx0icoHysrx6RCDEBxKAojw8HIYF5xdSwxIy ze1w==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=gaQ5N6jJcyVvT/K6PRB+jDJV+abZGfoHO9QF2R9zJ9I=; b=uB1VW0+khs+dsjOcp3mqtUkaIQOzM/pCaZPTOa8tXxw0TmK5G56Wk+CJNuWKbZhPJO //1HBVrv1tYetCSxQidEL8MG70qxg3FYuTRsAEjZKnzFrECBmO+x9+P5e5NF10nEwXJL wzMTqoXn3ypFOjOB92tEGg8GCsFaq+ktsyH+20XlPUKD2LQwIPlOwH0PtCfluuXIrDZs uM07GJu1PyweHcRoHss9IO344q+TYtuLpV/NpeWPSauJHGbP5C7pF9CFkhdwwA840Pn2 EA+o5Qq7O8mZF50/PPNmTmk9sK0MuP2YpxrP2QQ2TImH+G6NKu5VZ7UKvuCR9VIC0gyZ gGAQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tDAbGX8qLxA+nl0XfVg4A25bQt3fJxiHW3BaloOVERzrxuP6JeF 4ZVZTQ4Ahbv5ddyCcAaHx3fVknULgTDrjpQ60Z/gSg==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx49D77bZfxaR90q4OY6AhDf0+bHroFAEbvh+UIAKxv8ge5jQdntN8oYL5j02Y4yz2ztbJxXPPyyjf0+O7E0w97M=
X-Received: by 10.28.139.18 with SMTP id n18mr767728wmd.26.1523300627691; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.226.76 with HTTP; Mon, 9 Apr 2018 12:03:07 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <4EEF1FC6-E791-4EA0-AFF5-A8F2F079F946@kuehlewind.net>
References: <152273560463.13938.7697606193991737143@ietfa.amsl.com> <ABFC390D-60B5-4174-A1E6-ECB080C35EE6@ieee.org> <CAHw9_iJwkbAw2u3SYwb9EDq-iVovHn=E55HimHWLr_u2MFkmyQ@mail.gmail.com> <4EEF1FC6-E791-4EA0-AFF5-A8F2F079F946@kuehlewind.net>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2018 15:03:07 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iKWox4Wnu=hy49pfnGUGEj77ayH-Va-U7B=o9DJ3makqQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)" <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Cc: Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>, Eric Rescorla <ekr@rtfm.com>, MBONED WG <mboned@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/TKnt4jjwSDYCXsNrr5YLmEN-cyM>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23.txt
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 19:03:56 -0000

Awesome, thanks Mirja!

W

On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 11:25 AM, Mirja Kuehlewind (IETF)
<ietf@kuehlewind.net>; wrote:
> Hi Warren, hi Hitoschi,
>
> thanks for the summary below!
>
> Yes, the current version addresses my discus and I will clear now.
>
> One comment on this new text:
> "Each of these attempts should be initiated only after the previous
>            attempt has terminated ...“
> Maybe use normative language here:
> "Each of these attempts SOULD be initiated only after the previous
>            attempt has terminated ...“
> Or even:
> "Each of these attempts MUST only be initiated after the previous
>            attempt has terminated ...“
> Or to ne even more clear:
> "Each of these attempts MUST NOT be initiated before the previous
>            attempt has terminated ...“
>
> Thanks!
>
> Mirja
>
>
>
>> Am 03.04.2018 um 10:58 schrieb Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>;:
>>
>> [ +EKR, Mirja ]
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:12 AM, Hitoshi Asaeda <asaeda@ieee.org>; wrote:
>>> Hi WG and Warren,
>>>
>>> We've submitted our revised document for Mtrace version 2.
>>>
>>> We believe we had addressed all comments and concerns given during the last IESG review.
>>> Please kindly check the document and restart the IESG review again if you think it satisfies all.
>>
>> Dear EKR and Mirja,
>>
>> I think that this version addresses your DISCUSS points.
>>
>> As it's been a while (2 1/2 months) I've included some links to try
>> and make this is bit easier:
>>
>> Your initial reviews:
>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2/ballot/
>> Ballots: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-22&url2=draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23
>>
>> I've also tried to summarize your DISCUSS points and the fixes here:
>> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1NZJkqvg504syBUNkhnB9wod20ajoEJhFIusmUbJ0P20/edit?usp=sharing
>>
>> EKR: I'm not sure if you feel that the Security Considerations section
>> is now adequate.
>> Mirja: The document doesn't explicitly instruct IANA to update the
>> ports registry, but there is a reference to this draft already
>> (https://www.iana.org/assignments/service-names-port-numbers/service-names-port-numbers.xhtml?&page=129)
>> and so I beleive it will be done?
>>
>> If these address your DISCUSS points, would you be willing to clear?
>>
>> W
>>
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>>
>>> Hitoshi Asaeda
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2018/04/03 15:06, internet-drafts@ietf.org wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
>>>> This draft is a work item of the MBONE Deployment WG of the IETF.
>>>>
>>>>       Title           : Mtrace Version 2: Traceroute Facility for IP Multicast
>>>>       Authors         : Hitoshi Asaeda
>>>>                         Kerry Meyer
>>>>                         WeeSan Lee
>>>>      Filename        : draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23.txt
>>>>      Pages           : 38
>>>>      Date            : 2018-04-02
>>>>
>>>> Abstract:
>>>>  This document describes the IP multicast traceroute facility, named
>>>>  Mtrace version 2 (Mtrace2).  Unlike unicast traceroute, Mtrace2
>>>>  requires special implementations on the part of routers.  This
>>>>  specification describes the required functionality in multicast
>>>>  routers, as well as how an Mtrace2 client invokes a query and
>>>>  receives a reply.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2/
>>>>
>>>> There are also htmlized versions available at:
>>>> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23
>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23
>>>>
>>>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-mboned-mtrace-v2-23
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission
>>>> until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org.
>>>>
>>>> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
>>>> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> MBONED mailing list
>>>> MBONED@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>> idea in the first place.
>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>> of pants.
>>   ---maf
>



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf