IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc comment regarding AS112

Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com> Thu, 28 July 2011 15:28 UTC

Return-Path: <stig@venaas.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FCCC21F886A for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.581
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.581 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.018, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XwQf+nzcFbvF for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ufisa.uninett.no (ufisa.uninett.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2:158:38:152:126]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1D0B21F8B1D for <mboned@ietf.org>; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.21.69.132] (128-107-239-234.cisco.com [128.107.239.234]) by ufisa.uninett.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B83A38012; Thu, 28 Jul 2011 17:27:59 +0200 (CEST)
Message-ID: <4E317FFA.9000801@venaas.com>
Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 08:27:54 -0700
From: Stig Venaas <stig@venaas.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:5.0) Gecko/20110624 Thunderbird/5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: wmaton@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107280717230.27844@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.64.1107280717230.27844@ryouko.imsb.nrc.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: mboned@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [MBONED] draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc comment regarding AS112
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 15:28:02 -0000

On 7/28/2011 4:45 AM, William F. Maton Sotomayor wrote:
>
> All,
> I have read this document and have just one comment to make in context
> of AS112 DNS operations: Would it make sense to delegate the reverse map
> for the addresses specified in section 2 towards the AS112 project? In
> the past, the unicast addresses for documentation have, of course, been
> used by end-users and administrators (having personally cringed at
> seeing this myself behind someone's NAT). The reverse lookups then go on
> to load the root DNS servers and on it goes. cf RFC 6303 - 6305.

What do you think of getting actual reverse mappings for this? At
least for IPv4 it could be done. For IPv6 it is slightly more tricky,
depending on the authoritative DNS servers. Some servers should allow
a way to do PTR without explicitly having every entry in the zone
file or memory.

Stig

>
> Thanks,
>
> wfms
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email