Re: [MBONED] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)

Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk> Tue, 07 January 2020 10:07 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.chown@jisc.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 418EA120019 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 02:07:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=jisc.ac.uk
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CDVtAHZF9-Ou for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 02:06:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com (eu-smtp-delivery-189.mimecast.com [146.101.78.189]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A8BBE120026 for <mboned@ietf.org>; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 02:06:56 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jisc.ac.uk; s=mimecast20170213; t=1578391614; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=M1MmO4OORcB/yyX12cRaNBz/xb6aPijKKwp9o9ydz/Q=; b=gFyty9gps4XghcEkEjge6cJjtkcqvKMrDf0+NdEWYgtygIqIeVcyziPC7hCtZZXmmwMn+j rYoBy657cfrgb9a2rZzWCNqqSWf/W9nXGyWZKbcI9/1C9xYLBpjP8lLnmnYz0kqctUrwIO uMls7V+OQZ/KsFl1T3T6mMULNaEJGso=
Received: from EUR03-AM5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com (mail-am5eur03lp2055.outbound.protection.outlook.com [104.47.8.55]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id uk-mta-145-5Q88OS4uOGWMO9uw27N7TA-1; Tue, 07 Jan 2020 10:06:52 +0000
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.168.153.149) by AM5PR0701MB2482.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com (10.169.152.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.20.2623.4; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:06:47 +0000
Received: from AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::387c:d4f9:aa28:5081]) by AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com ([fe80::387c:d4f9:aa28:5081%9]) with mapi id 15.20.2623.008; Tue, 7 Jan 2020 10:06:47 +0000
From: Tim Chown <Tim.Chown@jisc.ac.uk>
To: Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net>
CC: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm@ietf.org>, Colin Doyle <cdoyle@juniper.net>, "mboned-chairs@ietf.org" <mboned-chairs@ietf.org>, "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHVxLg8FVyY2dVrbkOCw+0sObiYxqfd6A+AgAETIwA=
Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 10:06:47 +0000
Message-ID: <A5CE75BA-84B9-4524-9221-AC2D8A5F445B@jisc.ac.uk>
References: <157833235845.7999.12756109275491710476.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <alpine.DEB.2.02.2001060941590.27705@contrail-ubm-wing.svec1.juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.02.2001060941590.27705@contrail-ubm-wing.svec1.juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-GB, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-mailer: Apple Mail (2.3608.40.2.2.4)
x-originating-ip: [2001:a88:d510:1101:5543:6681:fa7b:886c]
x-ms-publictraffictype: Email
x-ms-office365-filtering-correlation-id: f2ea4d95-17f3-445a-e4db-08d793594e81
x-ms-traffictypediagnostic: AM5PR0701MB2482:
x-microsoft-antispam-prvs: <AM5PR0701MB248298C6076C3AD0207D4659D63F0@AM5PR0701MB2482.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com>
x-ms-oob-tlc-oobclassifiers: OLM:10000;
x-forefront-prvs: 027578BB13
x-forefront-antispam-report: SFV:NSPM; SFS:(10009020)(4636009)(346002)(376002)(136003)(396003)(366004)(39850400004)(199004)(189003)(6916009)(33656002)(2616005)(8936002)(81166006)(81156014)(53546011)(6506007)(66446008)(86362001)(36756003)(91956017)(71200400001)(64756008)(66476007)(76116006)(66556008)(66946007)(2906002)(966005)(478600001)(5660300002)(316002)(6486002)(786003)(186003)(54906003)(6512007)(4326008)(224303003); DIR:OUT; SFP:1101; SCL:1; SRVR:AM5PR0701MB2482; H:AM5PR0701MB2849.eurprd07.prod.outlook.com; FPR:; SPF:None; LANG:en; PTR:InfoNoRecords; A:1; MX:1;
x-ms-exchange-senderadcheck: 1
x-microsoft-antispam: BCL:0;
x-microsoft-antispam-message-info: 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
x-ms-exchange-transport-forked: True
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-OriginatorOrg: jisc.ac.uk
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-Network-Message-Id: f2ea4d95-17f3-445a-e4db-08d793594e81
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-originalarrivaltime: 07 Jan 2020 10:06:47.3882 (UTC)
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-fromentityheader: Hosted
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-id: 48f9394d-8a14-4d27-82a6-f35f12361205
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-mailboxtype: HOSTED
X-MS-Exchange-CrossTenant-userprincipalname: keOdvJiwDFm2yuFKg+etOpA7hmBOgaAyUcbWAs9ZcX/zn5+IQ01sM7EyJfOWD2DuTqRmNkxncplVtbBMndwYEA==
X-MS-Exchange-Transport-CrossTenantHeadersStamped: AM5PR0701MB2482
X-MC-Unique: 5Q88OS4uOGWMO9uw27N7TA-1
X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_A5CE75BA84B945249221AC2D8A5F445Bjiscacuk_"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/b4wKLj1CIiIV-Fafk50wdWqEHkI>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2020 10:07:01 -0000

Also, on 2119, we had the boilerplate in there but were not using the upper case form for the text.  After discussing with Eric and Warren we decided to remove the boilerplate and leave the text as is.  There seems to be no strong recommendation for use of 2119 (or not) in BCP docs.

Tim

On 6 Jan 2020, at 17:43, Leonard Giuliano <lenny@juniper.net<mailto:lenny@juniper.net>> wrote:


Mirja- thanks for your review.  MSDP is still a useful protocol for
intradomain deployments.

Thanks,
Lenny

On Mon, 6 Jan 2020, Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker wrote:

| Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
| draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: No Objection
|
| When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
| email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
| introductory paragraph, however.)
|
|
| Please refer to https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SwYTfHSrxYKqYQ0hNXrzIfM2FQ14xXR_wfwqXQTx53sfl7qRibXaX4gA5DwJs8M$
| for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
|
|
| The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
| https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm/__;!!NEt6yMaO-gk!SwYTfHSrxYKqYQ0hNXrzIfM2FQ14xXR_wfwqXQTx53sfl7qRibXaX4gAM4NQsks$
|
|
|
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
| COMMENT:
| ----------------------------------------------------------------------
|
| Thanks for this well-written document.
|
| I'm by far no expert here but reading this document it sounds a bit like
| RFC3618 should be moved to historic... was that discussed?
|
| This document seem not to use normative RFC2119 language but I think could
| benefit from it. Was that considered?
|
|
|