Re: [MBONED] WGLC for draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc

Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com> Mon, 09 January 2012 19:03 UTC

Return-Path: <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448D221F8858 for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:03:15 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.566
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.566 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.033, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZfwhcFG7wnrr for <mboned@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:03:14 -0800 (PST)
Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [119.145.14.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4081B21F884F for <mboned@ietf.org>; Mon, 9 Jan 2012 11:02:57 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (szxga05-in [172.24.2.49]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXJ001F8OWQV1@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for mboned@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:02:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxga05-in.huawei.com (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0LXJ00907OWQIZ@szxga05-in.huawei.com> for mboned@ietf.org; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:02:50 +0800 (CST)
Received: from szxeml207-edg.china.huawei.com ([172.24.2.119]) by szxrg02-dlp.huawei.com (MOS 4.1.9-GA) with ESMTP id AGF23367; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:02:49 +0800
Received: from SZXEML410-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.82.67.137) by szxeml207-edg.china.huawei.com (172.24.2.59) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:02:46 +0800
Received: from SZXEML526-MBX.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.37]) by szxeml410-hub.china.huawei.com ([10.82.67.137]) with mapi id 14.01.0323.003; Tue, 10 Jan 2012 03:02:34 +0800
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:02:33 +0000
From: Tina TSOU <Tina.Tsou.Zouting@huawei.com>
In-reply-to: <4F0AEC80.9070400@innovationslab.net>
To: Brian Haberman <brian@innovationslab.net>
Message-id: <07D1620B-9811-4290-98BD-2A610390E5CE@huawei.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-language: en-US
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Accept-Language: en-US, zh-CN
Thread-topic: [MBONED] WGLC for draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc
Thread-index: AQHMzL36yxUzR3VQSUSFSNWMx/fZ5ZX/f0eAgAQHewCAAOI+Hg==
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
References: <20120106134614.Q22957@eng-mail01.juniper.net> <9B57C850BB53634CACEC56EF4853FF653B3809EA@TK5EX14MBXW603.wingroup.windeploy.ntdev.microsoft.com> <4F0AEC80.9070400@innovationslab.net>
Cc: "mboned@ietf.org" <mboned@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [MBONED] WGLC for draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mboned>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2012 19:03:15 -0000

Support if Dave's comments are solved.

Sent from my iPad

On Jan 9, 2012, at 7:33 AM, "Brian Haberman" <brian@innovationslab.net> wrote:

> Modulo Dave's suggested changes, I believe this draft is ready to advance.
> 
> Regards,
> Brian
> 
> On 1/6/12 7:00 PM, Dave Thaler wrote:
>> I have read this draft and believe it's almost ready.   Just one technical comment and one nit.
>> 
>> Regarding section 2.1 (admin scoped addrs)...
>>> There are no specific scoped
>>> addresses available for documentation purposes.  Except for examples
>>> detailing the use of scoped multicast, one should avoid using them.
>> 
>> Why not assign a (single) scope relative address for IPv4 for documentation purposes?
>> It's not like we're currently in danger of running out of them.  That would then be
>> more consistent with the variable-scope request for IPv6 in sections 3 and 5.
>> 
>> Section 3.2 (Embedded RP)
>>> the unicast addresses reserved for documentation purposes, see see
>> 
>> s/see see/see/
>> 
>> -Dave Thaler
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: mboned-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mboned-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Leonard Giuliano
>> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2012 1:52 PM
>> To: MBONED WG
>> Subject: [MBONED] WGLC for draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc
>> 
>> 
>> We would like to start the Working Group Last Call on "Multicast Addresses for Documentation" to close on Jan 21, 2011.  This draft is very short and easy to read, so we encourage everyone to take a look.
>> 
>> Please review the document carefully, and send your feedback to the list.
>> Please also indicate whether or not you believe that this document is ready to go to the IESG.
>> 
>> Latest version of the doc can be found here:
>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc/
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MBONED mailing list
>> MBONED@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> MBONED mailing list
>> MBONED@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned
> 
> _______________________________________________
> MBONED mailing list
> MBONED@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned