[MBONED] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Mon, 06 January 2020 17:39 UTC

Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: mboned@ietf.org
Delivered-To: mboned@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81CA71200F5; Mon, 6 Jan 2020 09:39:18 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm@ietf.org, Colin Doyle <cdoyle@juniper.net>, mboned-chairs@ietf.org, cdoyle@juniper.net, mboned@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.115.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
Message-ID: <157833235845.7999.12756109275491710476.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 09:39:18 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/mboned/ygAG96nq2y7xczPJ2wtOegAijpA>
Subject: [MBONED] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: mboned@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Mail List for the Mboned Working Group <mboned.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/mboned/>
List-Post: <mailto:mboned@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mboned>, <mailto:mboned-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2020 17:39:19 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-mboned-deprecate-interdomain-asm/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Thanks for this well-written document.

I'm by far no expert here but reading this document it sounds a bit like
RFC3618 should be moved to historic... was that discussed?

This document seem not to use normative RFC2119 language but I think could
benefit from it. Was that considered?