IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [mdnsext] Discussion of BoF during Berlin IETF

"Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com> Tue, 04 June 2013 01:23 UTC

Return-Path: <john_brzozowski@cable.comcast.com>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5350121F9774 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.707
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.707 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.810, BAYES_00=-2.599, HOST_EQ_MODEMCABLE=1.368, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id U9liQ3whnpAf for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 18:23:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cable.comcast.com (pacdcavout01.cable.comcast.com [69.241.43.119]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1779721F94BA for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:41:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ([24.40.56.116]) by pacdcavout01.cable.comcast.com with ESMTP id 97wm3m1.54380333; Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:39:20 -0400
Received: from PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com ([169.254.1.173]) by pacdcexhub03.cable.comcast.com ([fe80::5527:6d6b:29a7:f414%13]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.001; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 20:41:37 -0400
From: "Brzozowski, John" <John_Brzozowski@Cable.Comcast.com>
To: "consultancy@vanderstok.org" <consultancy@vanderstok.org>, "mdnsext@ietf.org" <mdnsext@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [mdnsext] Discussion of BoF during Berlin IETF
Thread-Index: AQHOYDN5ldFGvOVfHUCwamdaDY33MZkkuEeA
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 00:41:37 +0000
Message-ID: <BD87928F6BFAEF4EBEB883E1C4F58772342B62EF@PACDCEXMB01.cable.comcast.com>
In-Reply-To: <3f9e642cbdc6f8bb1a996f786bc61b09@xs4all.nl>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.4.130416
x-originating-ip: [24.40.55.71]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <CFA19FAEFAD4634DA43AB1A1FDE32471@cable.comcast.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] Discussion of BoF during Berlin IETF
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 01:23:59 -0000

I think we are on the same page, thanks Peter.  I agree with the below and
do not disagree with the items you enumerated in your reply.


John


>Separating the work such that parts of the work are moved forward
>independently, but in mutual agreement, sounds great.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email