Re: [mdnsext] Discussion of BoF during Berlin IETF

peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl> Fri, 31 May 2013 06:24 UTC

Return-Path: <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8D89C21F96ED for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:24:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 1.243
X-Spam-Level: *
X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.243 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.747, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_NL=0.55, HOST_EQ_NL=1.545]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OkevKa-g93RE for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:24:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl [194.109.24.34]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7002621F9678 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 30 May 2013 23:24:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from roundcube.xs4all.nl (roundcube11.xs4all.net [194.109.20.209]) by smtp-vbr14.xs4all.nl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r4V6OTst033388 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2013 08:24:29 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from stokcons@xs4all.nl)
Received: from a82-95-140-48.adsl.xs4all.nl ([82.95.140.48]) by roundcube.xs4all.nl with HTTP (HTTP/1.1 POST); Fri, 31 May 2013 08:24:28 +0200
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 08:24:28 +0200
From: peter van der Stok <stokcons@xs4all.nl>
To: <mdnsext@ietf.org>
Organization: vanderstok consultancy
Mail-Reply-To: <consultancy@vanderstok.org>
In-Reply-To: <783F7CF8-7FDB-4F93-82C2-4291E329F844@gmail.com>
References: <14CE323C-0BCC-4B7F-976C-10070E156046@gmail.com> <783F7CF8-7FDB-4F93-82C2-4291E329F844@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <5c24b7358f8e4adb71187a17df9fc6bb@xs4all.nl>
X-Sender: stokcons@xs4all.nl (lRh8LcV/ZgNS9PSE+x5/m13w064dxh+R)
User-Agent: XS4ALL Webmail
X-Virus-Scanned: by XS4ALL Virus Scanner
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] Discussion of BoF during Berlin IETF
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: consultancy@vanderstok.org
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 06:24:42 -0000

Ralph,

I am certainly interested in this work and agree with the charter, 
which has improved with respect to the former version.
 From the point of view of building control, it is essential to do 
disovery on a multilink stand-alone network, and not needing to change 
the applications when the network is connected to a backbone with access 
to DNS. From the outside the resources on the now connected network 
should be visible with the same names, possibly suffixed with additional 
domain name information.

In the past I have commented on the requirements and I am looking 
forward to a new version.

Peter van der Stok.

Ralph Droms schreef op 2013-05-31 05:24:
> REMINDER!!!!
> 
> I'm looking for review and discussion of the BoF proposal and draft
> charter here:
> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext/current/msg00149.html
> 
> The mailing list has been quiet (0 responses so far).  Is there still
> interest in taking on this work?
> 
> - Ralph
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mdnsext mailing list
> mdnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext