Re: [mdnsext] Informal mdnsext "Bar BoF" at IETF 86, Mon 3/11
Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org> Tue, 19 March 2013 13:06 UTC
Return-Path: <kerlyn2001@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B5A221F86D3 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:06:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.143
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.143 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.833, BAYES_00=-2.599, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nuBuYilDddCh for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-oa0-f54.google.com (mail-oa0-f54.google.com [209.85.219.54]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9FC4C21F86B2 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-oa0-f54.google.com with SMTP id n12so405796oag.27 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=ioMcunD60u/T+aA4BFuEwZZplosPD+k1UMZXqRhgtL8=; b=Xjq8yKUoZugT6k1Df/neVc9OvYBTz9Fv62hbS8z1MIulmBYXuYPDkxsycYkzi+LfGM slOZakbZf39juBtkQ82urqwk3gLA8wgbbVTgmyQp5pnx1q01lNMfwoVLvfgfIuZHrcY2 92zWcuog+ywRLQrDrObXI2pS0QdOqcCjGvs1Sdhxmte+HFZRqtfmI7Yh+1g2ysfhohln hVbcdHIM9uOxh4E3yx8sLlxEDzL9CZysDWqLsDmQ+Kvh02/1bnbCYqeFsEw4h9Z/3rmA /bPC9X00vXrRlzlqAD5R9G4kg3rUs4704H/F8R/mcXwddk6pViU7SqR8dA68BYXrJli8 Iv1A==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.98.109 with SMTP id eh13mr1225238obb.50.1363698411195; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
Sender: kerlyn2001@gmail.com
Received: by 10.60.4.233 with HTTP; Tue, 19 Mar 2013 06:06:51 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <51479D93.4040607@umn.edu>
References: <CABOxzu0GJnp92bTSpJx+j7jJsUZuTuANTnF16Sk6WrYV608buA@mail.gmail.com> <51479D93.4040607@umn.edu>
Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 09:06:51 -0400
X-Google-Sender-Auth: WetkP4NCqSNFqhP8TAE9zjSAuiY
Message-ID: <CABOxzu04f8b1zuh52FcZFKQdY5S7Qe+OavMByNR8DfhkOUYLYQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Kerry Lynn <kerlyn@ieee.org>
To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="14dae93a15c361544e04d846c76b"
Cc: mdnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] Informal mdnsext "Bar BoF" at IETF 86, Mon 3/11
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:06:52 -0000
Hi David, et al. On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 7:04 PM, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> wrote: > Was there a successful "Bar Bof" for mdnsext at IETF 86. Minutes from a > Bar Bof is most definitely expecting too much. > > Yes, I think it was very helpful from a level-setting perspective. The meeting was was attended by Stuart, myself, Peter Van Der Stok, Anders Brandt, Dave Taht, Jim Gettys, and others. But, were there any discussions or conclusions worth reporting? Is a > working group proposal moving forward? > > Focusing on the tactical, we discussed and approved the current framing of the problem statement. This is roughly the task of defining one or more proposed standards for DNS- based naming and service discovery that fill the gap between the extrema of zero-conf mDNS and fully-managed global DNS. The use cases will be laid out on a spectrum of increasing administrative cost (where the cost must be weighed against the benefits). LLNs (i.e. multi-link subnets) must be considered in any proposed solution. Stuart also described his hybrid proxy solution and I think there's a good understanding of it now amongst this core group. I would be very happy to see a prototype running in Berlin. You may have seen the writeup that Stuart posted regarding how DNS-SD works with a conventional DNS infrastructure. I have been experimenting with AppleTV and will post a solution that can be deployed on campus at once, albeit with some administration required. I'll start working on the next requirements draft later this week based on the excellent comments by you and others so yes, we should have plenty of time to line up our ducks before the next IETF. I'm hoping we can pick up some of the enthusiastic criticism that was appearing over on the homenet list. One area where we still need work is on the security section; what are the new security issues raised by the use cases and how do we deal with them? I need to verify this, but I believe Ralph Droms will be replaced by Ted Lemon as the responsible AD going forward. Most important did you drink any good beer? Hope you drank one for me. :) > > Oh, we probably drank more than one for you. We were captives at the hotel (it being surrounded by swamps and alligators) and so were somewhat constrained regarding drafts that could be considered. I settled on Yuengling, which I always thought was Chinese for some reason, but I stand corrected ;-) Regards, -K- Thanks > > -- > ==============================**================== > David Farmer Email: farmer@umn.edu > Office of Information Technology > University of Minnesota > 2218 University Ave SE Phone: 1-612-626-0815 > Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029 Cell: 1-612-812-9952 > ==============================**================== >