Re: [mdnsext] BoF request posted

David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu> Mon, 10 June 2013 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <farmer@umn.edu>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB45A21F9A47 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:31:55 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AMpnEoIXwbNr for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:31:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vs-m.tc.umn.edu (vs-m.tc.umn.edu [134.84.135.97]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB61921F826B for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:31:50 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f177.google.com (mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177]) by vs-m.tc.umn.edu (UMN smtpd) with ESMTP for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:31:50 -0500 (CDT)
X-Umn-Remote-Mta: [N] mail-ob0-f177.google.com [209.85.214.177] #+LO+TR
X-Umn-Classification: local
Received: by mail-ob0-f177.google.com with SMTP id ta17so10523541obb.22 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:date:from:reply-to:organization:user-agent:mime-version :to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:x-gm-message-state; bh=zFQu8o4GoTkF7ZGnjUvTbagcCRa08tNWdO/Kxr0Xdq0=; b=law7546Y05w4eHZFUgy13KQV3Qio8GJn4zRBKs5OcGqihv/mqna6wzWLGSrMsrZYeE bbMzW4FF6/36VShuZh2jRi1nJaRvffirjkgsw6aS59jESSkev6gFP+OHoAZNeFfbxu38 0tLe1Hihql/iwSMUDmpVxPYnjxB8rJPEggaC0TWiDLrl+ngaXDBTVf6QpoNAzx/3UICX MefVqQ6WlWFJvgONceePYyouKmvbVnfNI+FSaQBWp6aNwxDnAd7SX41ym+qv5JUMO2Py 7Xn9BPTsYkEUVNRazqAxe/T+6zVqCit3THHr1VPtyByuO4Cf4zCG69MvuLF3Sz9CRd6U QI9w==
X-Received: by 10.60.94.70 with SMTP id da6mr9596344oeb.63.1370896309769; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Received: by 10.60.94.70 with SMTP id da6mr9596340oeb.63.1370896309681; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from x-128-101-234-182.uofm-secure.wireless.umn.edu ([2607:ea00:104:2000:50cf:17d3:c8d9:efee]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id c10sm24605316oej.1.2013.06.10.13.31.48 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 10 Jun 2013 13:31:49 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51B637B8.8000808@umn.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 15:31:52 -0500
From: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Organization: University of Minnesota
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Ralph Droms (rdroms)" <rdroms@cisco.com>
References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA36EC431@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA36EC431@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl//CD1v4VICRdiNciojdmiPoEdXw7VOQ2/DhlREXj9/M00suU/ETJQJlqHeYdpwUinTuVD0JE1gG2JoYcfw5xrL8nPZKgHkPzy9iSJx6W58eSe4h3uqNaNmBuH699oKZtoVVmO
Cc: "mdnsext@ietf.org" <mdnsext@ietf.org>, David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] BoF request posted
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: David Farmer <farmer@umn.edu>
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 20:31:55 -0000

On 6/10/13 14:33 , Ralph Droms (rdroms) wrote:
> I've posted the sdnssd BoF request here: http://trac.tools.ietf.org/bof/trac/wiki/WikiStart
>
> Review and comments (even as simple as "looks OK") encouraged.
>
> - Ralph
>
> _______________________________________________
> mdnsext mailing list
> mdnsext@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext
>

Minor nit; Substute "sdnssd WG" for "mdsnext WG" toward the end of the 
following paragraph;

     It is important that the sdnssd WG takes input from stakeholders in
     the scenarios it is considering. For example, the homenet WG is
     currently evaluating its own requirements for naming and service
     discovery; it is up to the homenet WG as to whether it wishes to
     recommend adoption of the solution developed in the mdsnext WG, and
     thus coordination between the WGs is desirable.

More substantial; Should there be any consideration of promoting 
inter-operation of the "early solutions" you refer to, in the goals or 
milestones, maybe as an operational BCP on the subject.  I'm more than a 
little worried about a mdns/sd-dns loop, or some kind of registration 
race condition causing duplicate names, being created by use of multiple 
of these "early solutions" in the same network.

-- 
================================================
David Farmer               Email: farmer@umn.edu
Office of Information Technology
University of Minnesota
2218 University Ave SE     Phone: 1-612-626-0815
Minneapolis, MN 55414-3029  Cell: 1-612-812-9952
================================================