Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext charter

SM <sm@resistor.net> Wed, 28 August 2013 22:02 UTC

Return-Path: <sm@resistor.net>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2A2D21E8054 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:02:21 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.52
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.52 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.079, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id e5TieaZV0uOu for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:02:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx.ipv6.elandsys.com (mx.ipv6.elandsys.com [IPv6:2001:470:f329:1::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E6C821F93C4 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:02:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from SUBMAN.resistor.net (IDENT:sm@localhost [127.0.0.1]) (authenticated bits=0) by mx.elandsys.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7SM1WTB015024; Wed, 28 Aug 2013 15:01:36 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=opendkim.org; s=mail2010; t=1377727298; bh=Jxjge6oe4DXY+LHWjZPMMmp7hogeFj7NLk9houc32Xw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=DJ1FUPu6ni6+eSgXI4oCD13xFazG/L3wrbG5YttHfZlwlxqr9d9Z/UySFvHfpvgEA zfJ3PzZfSZS46SXSB4+8TaBiUyB0O2c2VqFIKviNZSCqkLZJY3noeprNaR97Zi12vP ZUJofbNPqqBrScFc4WHhhCauuxkBmv/k9DNW/lME=
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=resistor.net; s=mail; t=1377727298; i=@resistor.net; bh=Jxjge6oe4DXY+LHWjZPMMmp7hogeFj7NLk9houc32Xw=; h=Date:To:From:Subject:Cc:In-Reply-To:References; b=EozKiPAEYIrxPVokKSAS9NIqWuiONaGTnWp2oFYtxU15GyU5Rq4UfFZtude3tVqFU WMoBldHswH7BIwByiHjseuGWJc8e7EyvpzJPvH9WK60sULrjeu7fzUQXk5cRH9ojSD cAfcFYM4TIPZpoNp6c6z2aS5/nh+LwgBvoxh+Tx8=
Message-Id: <6.2.5.6.2.20130828144342.0c80fd88@resistor.net>
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.2.5.6
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 14:47:46 -0700
To: Tim Chown <tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
From: SM <sm@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <EMEW3|b49467b60dedbd0bb02996c906917987p7RAie03tjc|ecs.soto n.ac.uk|52BE61DF-4677-4576-B501-C0EE42A94A22@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA301ABFCB8@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com> <f083fbd79348a50cda89656bb4ca1632@xs4all.nl> <CABOxzu1XsFn838putfXTmy0=8jfdsZuSb5=kL9--cg0mHs9RZA@mail.gmail.com> <D9B9F172-207C-4D90-AA6B-5DF14EE81A0D@gmail.com> <E36F274013087B4EA05E08EB503750390BE3A6B4@DENBGAT9EK1MSX.ww902.siemens.net> <9B02E320-7496-4230-BE86-A9003ABB359B@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|9918d88d5296d895217f3769a4167892p7R9iD03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|9B02E320-7496-4230-BE86-A9003ABB359B@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <6.2.5.6.2.20130828015008.0bf9e810@resistor.net> <52BE61DF-4677-4576-B501-C0EE42A94A22@ecs.soton.ac.uk> <EMEW3|b49467b60dedbd0bb02996c906917987p7RAie03tjc|ecs.soton.ac.uk|52BE61DF-4677-4576-B501-C0EE42A94A22@ecs.soton.ac.uk>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Cc: mdnsext@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext charter
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 22:02:21 -0000

Hi Tim,
At 02:44 28-08-2013, Tim Chown wrote:
>If candidate WGs were treated the same way as real WGs within the 
>tools system, related drafts could presumably also be automatically 
>listed, for example?

The IETF will end up having side-working groups.  It's not a good 
idea in my opinion. :-)

Regards,
-sm