Re: [mdnsext] BoF details

"Aijun Wang" <wangaj@ctbri.com.cn> Fri, 12 July 2013 01:25 UTC

Return-Path: <wangaj@ctbri.com.cn>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 360A811E80D9 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:25:09 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -0.148
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.148 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_CHARSET_FARAWAY=2.45]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C7VH84Y2AV57 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:25:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.ctbri.com.cn (mail.ctbri.com.cn [219.142.69.47]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4ADE111E81F0 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Jul 2013 18:25:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ctbriwangaij ([10.9.53.90]) by mail.ctbri.com.cn (Lotus Domino Release 8.5.3FP1) with ESMTP id 2013071209245413-77122 ; Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:24:54 +0800
From: "Aijun Wang" <wangaj@ctbri.com.cn>
To: "'Ralph Droms \(rdroms\)'" <rdroms@cisco.com>, <mdnsext@ietf.org>
References: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA3785D4E@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <4518F39EB578034D8C99A9B7776CDBA3785D4E@xmb-aln-x04.cisco.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 09:24:55 +0800
Message-ID: <002a01ce7e9e$9d8a4460$d89ecd20$@com.cn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 12.0
Thread-Index: AQHOfj2KMKPaeTY5zkO+HeXGTso4AZlgPhjA
X-MIMETrack: Itemize by SMTP Server on mailserver/ctbri(Release 8.5.3FP1|March 07, 2012) at 2013/07/12 09:24:54, Serialize by Router on mailserver/ctbri(Release 8.5.3FP1|March 07, 2012) at 2013/07/12 09:25:01, Serialize complete at 2013/07/12 09:25:01
X-TNEFEvaluated: 1
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_002B_01CE7EE1.ABAD8460"
Content-Language: zh-cn
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] BoF details
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 01:25:09 -0000

Hi, all

 

Is it necessary to add  some description in the charter part for comparing
the difficulty to accomplish the service registration and discovery in
multi-link scenario by DNS update(RFC2136&RFC3007) plus DNS-SD(RFC 6763)?  

 

Best Regards.

 

Aijun Wang

 

China Telecom Corporation Limited Beijing Research Institute 

Network Infrastructure Reserach Division  

Network Technology Research Department 

Tel : 010-58552347

Mobile:  13301168517

 

 

 

发件人: mdnsext-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:mdnsext-bounces@ietf.org] 代表
Ralph Droms (rdroms)
发送时间: 2013年7月11日 21:50
收件人: mdnsext@ietf.org
主题: [mdnsext] BoF details

 

Here is the draft agenda for the BoF (with minor correction):

BoF Logistics: 0900-1130 CEST Wednesday (7/31/13)

Draft agenda (2 hr scheduled for 2.5 hr meeting slot)
1. Administrivia (Chairs, 5 mins)   
   Note Well and agenda bashing

2. Goals of the BoF (Chairs, 15 mins)
   Review of IETF 85 mdsnext BoF and progress since then

3. Requirements (TBD, 30 mins)
   draft-lynn-mdnsext-requirements-01

4. Open discussion (Chairs, 40 mins)
   Open mic; includes draft charter and deliverables

5. Key questions (Chairs, 30 mins)
   Are we ready to form a WG with the agreed charter, subject to mail
     list confirmation?  
   Note RFC5434 section 1.

The draft charter is attached (this time for sure).  Review and comment
requested...

- Ralph