Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext BoF in Berlin

Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> Sun, 23 June 2013 11:01 UTC

Return-Path: <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C5521F8F6E for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 04:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.535
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.535 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.932, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id B-Mz4oiireP2 for <mdnsext@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 04:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ve0-x22c.google.com (mail-ve0-x22c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c01::22c]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3246B21F8E98 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 04:01:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ve0-f172.google.com with SMTP id jz10so7876417veb.17 for <mdnsext@ietf.org>; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 04:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date :to; bh=BBlUrv8iTGwPgVblP7eUVoOtopSBNQT7/2WzJVMH/ek=; b=pBGdxdFI/t6LvJ+uEwLl1WRe4pCYUjIOM0eEsIosgOE+Y5jLAv5PlSoB5IRMMTd1jh 8KtpqRoTqQCmR5lGOasZE0zDF9Kq+0zburLMxUsJf2tn6cA3L6UfgAwv31m5XJKq9bXB 1MTxjk+ZWlPYVdT8punLGPSgaV7b1xMAWe4sfr/E8jl3SRmg9KEZokq0auZ1PqYcEar8 DmohgxsJMElO8hLxvqASvapeG1azqCVZKTMMwtecgiXuIP7v2Zt68IMeyfhe5MK6qPnv woZB5ENPX7r5g5d7FGkFWbbpf0OT2b7Voxc+Hw7U0mnZ5fX6iZ0QuX9RDadqQiwC5xYY tT8A==
X-Received: by 10.58.255.229 with SMTP id at5mr9266356ved.44.1371985299605; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 04:01:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.128] (c-24-62-231-127.hsd1.ma.comcast.net. [24.62.231.127]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id zy9sm13793169veb.7.2013.06.23.04.01.38 for <multiple recipients> (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 04:01:38 -0700 (PDT)
References: <20130620183604.563.97531.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <352651CB-88BF-4877-82A2-280CBCDF8AE8@gmail.com> <ECA793C8-F806-40B7-BE71-82369FCAFCDC@townsley.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <ECA793C8-F806-40B7-BE71-82369FCAFCDC@townsley.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3D51A65-63D8-4771-8EED-0B172DDDAADB@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B350)
From: Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:01:37 -0400
To: "Townsley.net" <mark@townsley.net>
Cc: "mdnsext@ietf.org" <mdnsext@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [mdnsext] dnssdext BoF in Berlin
X-BeenThere: mdnsext@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion of extensions to Bonjour \(mDNS and DNS-SD\) for routed networks." <mdnsext.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/mdnsext>
List-Post: <mailto:mdnsext@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext>, <mailto:mdnsext-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 11:01:41 -0000

I assumed that the BoF would be scheduled to avoid all INT area WG sessions.  However, it might be better to list specific groups as first priority and INT area as a second priority.

First priority: dnsop, v6ops, appsawg, homenet, 6man, dhc, 6lo, mboned, core
Second priority: INT area WGs

Any suggestions about other first priority conflicts to avoid?

- Ralph

On Jun 22, 2013, at 3:09 AM, "Townsley.net" <mark@townsley.net> wrote:

> 
> Please add homenet to the list of WGs to avoid. 
> 
> - Mark
> 
> (Thumbtyped)
> 
> On 21 juin 2013, at 19:52, Ralph Droms <rdroms.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> The request for a dnssdext BoF in Berlin has been approved by the IESG.  The BoF logistics are included below.  Note the name of the BoF is dnssdext, not sdnssd.  The BoF will be scheduled in the IETF-87 agenda along with other BoFs and WG meetings, so we'll know the date and time of the meeting as soon as the agenda is completed.
>> 
>> Please review the information below and reply with questions or suggested updates.  In particular, are there any other WG/BoF sessions that should be be listed as "Conflicts to Avoid"?  I've already sent in a request to drop "intarea" from the explicit list and add a special request to avoid conflicts with all INT area WG sessions.
>> 
>> - Ralph
>> 
>> Begin forwarded message:
>> 
>>> From: "\"IETF Meeting Session Request Tool\"" <session_request_developers@ietf.org>
>>> Subject: dnssdext - New Meeting Session Request for IETF 87
>>> Date: June 20, 2013 2:36:04 PM EDT
>>> To: session-request@ietf.org
>>> Cc: dnssdext-ads@tools.ietf.org, rdroms.ietf@gmail.com, tjc@ecs.soton.ac.uk, cmorgan@amsl.com
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> A new meeting session request has just been submitted by Cindy Morgan, on behalf of the dnssdext working group.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>>> Working Group Name: DNS-SD Extensions
>>> Area Name: Internet Area
>>> Session Requester: Cindy Morgan
>>> 
>>> Number of Sessions: 1
>>> Length of Session(s):  2 Hours
>>> Number of Attendees: 150
>>> Conflicts to Avoid: 
>>> First Priority: intarea, dnsop, v6ops, appsawg 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Special Requests:
>>> 
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mdnsext mailing list
>> mdnsext@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mdnsext