Re: [media-types] Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112

[Mark Nottingham <[e-mail]>]

Hi Harald,

I support these actions, but one question -- just because the WG adopts these drafts, it doesn't necessarily follow that they'll be published 1:1 as RFCs, does it? I.e., it may be that the WG decides to roll them into a more general document that obsoletes or updates the current authorities.

Cheers,


> On 10 Nov 2021, at 2:37 am, Harald Alvestrand <[e-mail]> wrote:
> 
> The following opinion polls were taken at the IETF meeting of MEDIAMAN, which translate directly into WG decisions if confirmed on the mailing list.
> 
> The questions asked, with hand raised / hand not raised numbers:
> 
> - Should there be a process for creating a new top level type? (10:2)
> 
> - Should we adopt the haptics draft? (14:0)
> 
> - Should we adopt the suffixes draft? (10:0)
> 
> If the list agrees with the consensus answers to this question, the chair will:
> 
> - Start work for writing up a process on how to create a new top level type
> 
> - Instruct the "haptics" authors to republish as an IETF draft
> 
> - Instruct the "suffixes" authors to republish as an IETF draft
> 
> If you wish to support or oppose any of these decisions, please reply to this message explaining your position.
> 
> Harald
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> media-types mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types

--
Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/