IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [media-types] Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112

Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> Wed, 10 November 2021 07:42 UTC

Return-Path: <harald@alvestrand.no>
X-Original-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: media-types@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45AA03A1355 for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:42:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.227
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.227 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-3.33, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c7A6YVSC412a for <media-types@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mork.alvestrand.no (mork.alvestrand.no [IPv6:2001:700:1:2::117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 98AE33A1352 for <media-types@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 Nov 2021 23:42:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.3.157] (unknown [78.156.11.215]) by mork.alvestrand.no (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 56DE07C731B; Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:42:27 +0100 (CET)
To: Mark Nottingham <mnot@mnot.net>
Cc: media-types@ietf.org
References: <c70cd535-127f-640f-99ec-8a8e517d7eca@alvestrand.no> <8ED82C99-7FE1-4EF4-BF33-4C9B2C5A0E47@mnot.net>
From: Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no>
Message-ID: <60007867-40f6-6311-f87f-d6eb691fa12d@alvestrand.no>
Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 08:42:26 +0100
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.14.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <8ED82C99-7FE1-4EF4-BF33-4C9B2C5A0E47@mnot.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Language: en-US
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/media-types/7Huxu2sG4Rj8emf_hDdAi-JA1mc>
Subject: Re: [media-types] Confirming consensus - polls taken at IETF 112
X-BeenThere: media-types@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IANA mailing list for reviewing Media Type \(MIME Type, Content Type\) registration requests." <media-types.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/media-types/>
List-Post: <mailto:media-types@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types>, <mailto:media-types-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2021 07:42:37 -0000

On 11/10/21 3:32 AM, Mark Nottingham wrote:
> Hi Harald,
>
> I support these actions, but one question -- just because the WG adopts these drafts, it doesn't necessarily follow that they'll be published 1:1 as RFCs, does it? I.e., it may be that the WG decides to roll them into a more general document that obsoletes or updates the current authorities.

Absolutely.

In particular, we should think about whether the ++ draft should be an 
update to RFC 3023 (suffixes in general) rather than an add-on document.

My personal view is that -haptics- can remain standalone.


>
> Cheers,
>
>
>> On 10 Nov 2021, at 2:37 am, Harald Alvestrand <harald@alvestrand.no> wrote:
>>
>> The following opinion polls were taken at the IETF meeting of MEDIAMAN, which translate directly into WG decisions if confirmed on the mailing list.
>>
>> The questions asked, with hand raised / hand not raised numbers:
>>
>> - Should there be a process for creating a new top level type? (10:2)
>>
>> - Should we adopt the haptics draft? (14:0)
>>
>> - Should we adopt the suffixes draft? (10:0)
>>
>> If the list agrees with the consensus answers to this question, the chair will:
>>
>> - Start work for writing up a process on how to create a new top level type
>>
>> - Instruct the "haptics" authors to republish as an IETF draft
>>
>> - Instruct the "suffixes" authors to republish as an IETF draft
>>
>> If you wish to support or oppose any of these decisions, please reply to this message explaining your position.
>>
>> Harald
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> media-types mailing list
>> media-types@ietf.org
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/media-types
> --
> Mark Nottingham   https://www.mnot.net/
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email